Pugh M
Department of Politics, University of Plymouth.
Disasters. 1998 Dec;22(4):339-51. doi: 10.1111/1467-7717.00097.
An important trend in military doctrine for so-called 'peace support operations' has been to place them on a spectrum that includes coercion and enforcement. This paper focuses on British writers of doctrine as those responsible for driving the debate forward and forging a consensus among leading military powers. Their discourse is combat oriented, a fact reinforced by a trend towards strategic subcontracting to coalitions of the militarily willing and able. At the same time, there has been a move to institutionalise the involvement of military forces in relief, peace building and development activities. The overall emphasis is on stability and security to facilitate the delivery of humanitarian relief and to establish the conditions for peace-building processes. In the case of Bosnia, this involves conditionality and economic leverage. Although there is a long-established record of peace-keeping forces engaging in goodwill activities (with mixed results), the current trends contain contradictions that seem likely to contribute to the widely perceived erosion of classical humanitarian principles.
所谓“和平支援行动”军事理论的一个重要趋势是将这些行动置于一个包含强制和执法的范畴中。本文聚焦于英国军事理论撰写者，他们推动了相关辩论并在主要军事大国间达成共识。他们的论述以战斗为导向，这一事实因向有军事意愿和能力的联盟进行战略分包的趋势而得到强化。与此同时，出现了将军事力量参与救援、和平建设及发展活动制度化的动向。总体重点在于稳定与安全，以便利提供人道主义救援并为和平建设进程创造条件。在波斯尼亚的情况中，这涉及附加条件和经济杠杆作用。尽管维和部队长期以来有从事善意活动的记录（结果好坏参半），但当前趋势存在矛盾之处，似乎可能导致人们普遍认为的传统人道主义原则受到侵蚀。
