• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿奇霉素与米诺环素治疗粉刺性痤疮和丘疹脓疱性痤疮的比较。

Azithromycin compared with minocycline in the treatment of acne comedonica and papulo-pustulosa.

作者信息

Gruber F, Grubisić-Greblo H, Kastelan M, Brajac I, Lenković M, Zamolo G

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Clinical Hospital Center, Rijeka, Croatia.

出版信息

J Chemother. 1998 Dec;10(6):469-73. doi: 10.1179/joc.1998.10.6.469.

DOI:10.1179/joc.1998.10.6.469
PMID:9876055
Abstract

This open study was conducted in 72 outpatients with acne vulgaris, to compare the clinical efficacy and tolerability of azithromycin and minocycline. Azithromycin was administered as a single oral dose (500 mg/day) for 4 days in four cycles every 10 days and minocycline was administered 100 mg daily for 6 weeks. Improvement was assessed 6 weeks after initiation of treatment with a four-graded scale. A satisfactory clinical response was observed in 75.8% of the patients treated with azithromycin and in 70.5% of those treated with minocycline. There were no significant differences between these two acne treatments in terms of reduction of the number of lesions (p> 0.05). Both agents were well tolerated and mild side effects were reported in 10.3% of azithromycin and 11.7% of minocycline treated patients. We conclude that azithromycin is at least as clinically effective and well tolerated as minocycline as treatment of facial comedonic and papulopustular acne.

摘要

这项开放性研究纳入了72例寻常痤疮门诊患者,旨在比较阿奇霉素和米诺环素的临床疗效及耐受性。阿奇霉素采用单次口服给药(500毫克/天),每10天为一个周期,共4个周期,持续4天;米诺环素每日给药100毫克,持续6周。治疗开始6周后,采用四级评分量表评估病情改善情况。接受阿奇霉素治疗的患者中,75.8%观察到满意的临床反应;接受米诺环素治疗的患者中,这一比例为70.5%。在减少皮损数量方面,这两种痤疮治疗方法之间无显著差异(p>0.05)。两种药物耐受性均良好,接受阿奇霉素治疗的患者中10.3%报告有轻微副作用,接受米诺环素治疗的患者中这一比例为11.7%。我们得出结论,在治疗面部粉刺性和丘疹脓疱性痤疮方面,阿奇霉素在临床疗效和耐受性上至少与米诺环素相当。

相似文献

1
Azithromycin compared with minocycline in the treatment of acne comedonica and papulo-pustulosa.阿奇霉素与米诺环素治疗粉刺性痤疮和丘疹脓疱性痤疮的比较。
J Chemother. 1998 Dec;10(6):469-73. doi: 10.1179/joc.1998.10.6.469.
2
A comparison of the efficacy and safety of lymecycline and minocycline in patients with moderately severe acne vulgaris.赖甲环素与米诺环素治疗中度重症寻常痤疮患者的疗效及安全性比较。
Eur J Dermatol. 1998 Apr-May;8(3):161-6.
3
Azithromycin for the treatment of acne.阿奇霉素用于治疗痤疮。
Int J Dermatol. 2000 Jan;39(1):45-50. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-4362.2000.00749.x.
4
A phase IV, open-label study evaluating the use of triple-combination therapy with minocycline HCl extended-release tablets, a topical antibiotic/retinoid preparation and benzoyl peroxide in patients with moderate to severe acne vulgaris.一项IV期开放标签研究,评估盐酸米诺环素缓释片、一种外用抗生素/维甲酸制剂和过氧化苯甲酰三联组合疗法用于中度至重度寻常痤疮患者的情况。
J Drugs Dermatol. 2013 Jun 1;12(6):619-25.
5
Pulsed azithromycin treatment is as effective and safe as 2-week-longer daily doxycycline treatment of acne vulgaris: a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority study.脉冲式阿奇霉素治疗与为期两周更长时间的每日强力霉素治疗寻常痤疮同样有效且安全:一项随机、双盲、非劣效性研究。
Skinmed. 2011 Mar-Apr;9(2):86-94.
6
Comparison of efficacy of azithromycin vs. doxycycline in the treatment of acne vulgaris.阿奇霉素与多西环素治疗寻常痤疮的疗效比较。
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2005 May;30(3):215-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2005.01769.x.
7
Clinical inquiries. Which oral antibiotics are best for acne?
J Fam Pract. 2011 May;60(5):290-2.
8
Moderate acne vulgaris: efficacy, tolerance and compliance of oral azithromycin thrice weekly for.中度寻常痤疮:每周三次口服阿奇霉素的疗效、耐受性及依从性
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2008;16(1):13-8.
9
Superior efficacy of azithromycin and levamisole vs. azithromycin in the treatment of inflammatory acne vulgaris: an investigator blind randomized clinical trial on 169 patients.阿奇霉素与左旋咪唑联合用药对比阿奇霉素治疗炎症性寻常痤疮的疗效更佳:一项针对169例患者的研究者盲法随机临床试验
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Jun;51(6):490-4. doi: 10.5414/CP201861.
10
Safety and efficacy comparison of minocycline microgranules vs lymecycline in the treatment of mild to moderate acne: randomized, evaluator-blinded, parallel, and prospective clinical trial for 8 weeks.米诺环素微粒与赖甲环素治疗轻至中度痤疮的安全性和疗效比较:为期8周的随机、评估者盲法、平行前瞻性临床试验。
J Drugs Dermatol. 2014 Jun;13(6):671-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Tetracyclines and photosensitive skin reactions: A narrative review.四环素类药物与光敏性皮肤反应:叙述性综述。
Dermatol Ther. 2021 Jul;34(4):e14978. doi: 10.1111/dth.14978. Epub 2021 May 24.
2
Efficacy of Azithromycin in Treatment of Acne Vulgaris: A Mini Review.阿奇霉素治疗寻常痤疮的疗效:一篇综述
World J Plast Surg. 2019 May;8(2):127-134. doi: 10.29252/wjps.8.2.127.
3
Comparison of the Efficacy of Azithromycin Versus Doxycycline in Acne Vulgaris: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.阿奇霉素与多西环素治疗寻常痤疮的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Ann Dermatol. 2018 Aug;30(4):417-426. doi: 10.5021/ad.2018.30.4.417. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
4
Synchronizing Pharmacotherapy in Acne with Review of Clinical Care.痤疮药物治疗与临床护理评估的同步性
Indian J Dermatol. 2017 Jul-Aug;62(4):341-357. doi: 10.4103/ijd.IJD_41_17.
5
Minocycline for acne vulgaris: efficacy and safety.米诺环素治疗寻常痤疮:疗效与安全性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 15;2012(8):CD002086. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002086.pub2.