Vojvodic D, Jerolimov V, Celebic A, Catovic A
School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
J Prosthet Dent. 1999 Jan;81(1):1-6.
The Kevloc bonding system is based on the bond of acrylic resin with the metal surface, in contrast to the Silicoater system, which covers the metal surface with a SiOx-C layer. Bonding prevents the occurrence of the marginal gap between the metal and the resin, which causes weaker bond strengths and discoloration.
This investigation examined the bond strength values achieved by using the Kevloc technique on Ag-Pd and Co-Cr alloys, and compared them with those obtained by the Silicoater technique. After artificial aging, shear testing of the specimens was performed.
A microscope image analyzer measured the thickness of bonding layers to reveal any marginal gap.
No marginal gap was noticed for either technique. The Kevloc technique provided better results than Silicoater regardless of alloy used. Immersion in water (7.64 to 8. 05 MPa) and thermocycling (6.12 to 6.95 MPa) reduced the initial bond strength values (12.52 to 12.94 MPa), but the breakdown occurred between the opaque layers or between the opaque and the resin, thus giving a cohesive type of failure.
The dental alloy used did not affect bond strengths and artificial aging caused reduction in bond strengths. The Kevloc bonding system exhibited higher bond strengths than Silicoater, but the marginal gap was not seen for either bonding system.
Kevloc粘结系统基于丙烯酸树脂与金属表面的粘结,这与Silicoater系统不同,后者用SiOx - C层覆盖金属表面。粘结可防止金属与树脂之间出现边缘间隙,边缘间隙会导致粘结强度较弱和变色。
本研究检测了使用Kevloc技术在银钯合金和钴铬合金上获得的粘结强度值,并将其与Silicoater技术获得的粘结强度值进行比较。在人工老化后,对样本进行剪切测试。
用显微镜图像分析仪测量粘结层的厚度以揭示是否存在边缘间隙。
两种技术均未发现边缘间隙。无论使用何种合金,Kevloc技术都比Silicoater技术效果更好。浸入水中(7.64至8.05兆帕)和热循环(6.12至6.95兆帕)会降低初始粘结强度值(12.52至12.94兆帕),但破坏发生在不透明层之间或不透明层与树脂之间,从而产生内聚型破坏。
所用牙科合金不影响粘结强度,人工老化会导致粘结强度降低。Kevloc粘结系统的粘结强度高于Silicoater,但两种粘结系统均未出现边缘间隙。