• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国的医疗保健质量如何?

How good is the quality of health care in the United States?

作者信息

Schuster M A, McGlynn E A, Brook R H

机构信息

RAND, Santa Monica, CA, USA.

出版信息

Milbank Q. 1998;76(4):517-63, 509. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00105.

DOI:10.1111/1468-0009.00105
PMID:9879302
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2751100/
Abstract

Studies over the past decade show that some people are receiving more care than they need, and some are receiving less. Simple averages from a number of studies indicate that 50 percent of people received recommended preventive care; 70 percent, recommended acute care; 30 percent, contraindicated acute care; 60 percent, recommended chronic care; and 20 percent, contraindicated chronic care. These studies strongly suggest that the care delivered in the United States often does not meet professional standards. Efforts to measure quality and report routinely on the results to the public at large would allow more definitive assessments of the status of the nation's health care and would enable us to single out the areas in need of improvement.

摘要

过去十年的研究表明,一些人接受的护理超出了他们的需求,而另一些人则接受得不够。多项研究的简单平均值显示,50%的人接受了推荐的预防性护理;70%的人接受了推荐的急性护理;30%的人接受了禁忌的急性护理;60%的人接受了推荐的慢性护理;20%的人接受了禁忌的慢性护理。这些研究有力地表明,美国提供的护理往往不符合专业标准。衡量质量并定期向广大公众报告结果的努力,将使人们能够对国家医疗保健状况进行更明确的评估,并使我们能够找出需要改进的领域。

相似文献

1
How good is the quality of health care in the United States?美国的医疗保健质量如何?
Milbank Q. 1998;76(4):517-63, 509. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00105.
2
The Quality of Outpatient Care Delivered to Adults in the United States, 2002 to 2013.2002 年至 2013 年美国成年人的门诊医疗服务质量。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Dec 1;176(12):1778-1790. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6217.
3
How good is the quality of health care in the United States? 1998.1998年美国医疗保健的质量如何?
Milbank Q. 2005;83(4):843-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00403.x.
4
Who is at greatest risk for receiving poor-quality health care?谁最有可能接受低质量的医疗保健服务?
N Engl J Med. 2006 Mar 16;354(11):1147-56. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa044464.
5
Risk of receiving poor health care is significant in all parts of the United States.在美国各地,接受劣质医疗服务的风险都很高。
Rep Med Guidel Outcomes Res. 2004 Jun 11;15(11):1-2, 5-6.
6
Systematic review: comparison of the quality of medical care in Veterans Affairs and non-Veterans Affairs settings.系统评价:退伍军人事务部和非退伍军人事务部医疗服务质量比较。
Med Care. 2011 Jan;49(1):76-88. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181f53575.
7
Is health care ready for Six Sigma quality?医疗保健是否已为六西格玛质量做好准备?
Milbank Q. 1998;76(4):565-91, 510. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00106.
8
Identifying potentially avoidable hospital admissions from canadian long-term care facilities.识别加拿大长期护理机构中潜在可避免的住院情况。
Med Care. 2009 Feb;47(2):250-4. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181847588.
9
The quality of ambulatory care delivered to children in the United States.美国为儿童提供的门诊医疗服务质量。
N Engl J Med. 2007 Oct 11;357(15):1515-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa064637.
10
Survey reveals the most overused, underused services.调查揭示了最常被过度使用和未充分利用的服务。
Capitation Manag Rep. 2003 Sep;10(9):125-7.

引用本文的文献

1
To treat or not to treat? Oncologists' perceptions and experiences regarding overtreatment in end stage cancer patients.治疗还是不治疗?肿瘤学家对晚期癌症患者过度治疗的看法与经历。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 10;12:1607479. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1607479. eCollection 2025.
2
The Challenges Ahead: Concepts, Analytics, and Ethics of Value-Based Care in Applied Behavior Analysis.未来的挑战:应用行为分析中基于价值的护理的概念、分析方法与伦理
Behav Anal Pract. 2024 Jun 5;17(4):949-966. doi: 10.1007/s40617-024-00937-x. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
The Power of Rapid Reviews for Bridging the Knowledge-to-Action Gap in Evidence-Based Virtual Health Care.快速综述在弥合循证虚拟医疗中知识到行动差距方面的作用。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 22;26:e54821. doi: 10.2196/54821.
4
Split-sample reliability estimation in health care quality measurement: Once is not enough.在医疗质量测量中进行分割样本可靠性估计:一次不够。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug;59(4):e14310. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14310. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
5
The Canadian Women's Heart Health Alliance ATLAS on the Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Management of Cardiovascular Disease in Women - Chapter 8: Knowledge Gaps and Status of Existing Research Programs in Canada.加拿大女性心脏健康联盟关于女性心血管疾病流行病学、诊断与管理的地图集——第8章:加拿大现有研究项目的知识差距与现状
CJC Open. 2023 Nov 17;6(2Part B):220-257. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2023.11.013. eCollection 2024 Feb.
6
Clinical practice guideline-inconsistent management of fever and neutropenia in pediatric oncology: A Children's Oncology Group study.临床实践指南不一致的发热和中性粒细胞减少症在儿科肿瘤学的管理:一个儿童肿瘤学组的研究。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2024 Apr;71(4):e30880. doi: 10.1002/pbc.30880. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
7
Development of quality indicators for palliative care in intensive care units and pilot testing them via electronic medical record review.重症监护病房姑息治疗质量指标的制定及通过电子病历审查进行试点测试。
J Intensive Care. 2024 Jan 9;12(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s40560-023-00713-z.
8
Connecting the science and practice of implementation - applying the lens of context to inform study design in implementation research.连接实施的科学与实践——运用情境视角为实施研究中的研究设计提供信息。
Front Health Serv. 2023 Jul 7;3:1162762. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1162762. eCollection 2023.
9
How experienced wound care nurses conceptualize what to do in pressure injury management.经验丰富的伤口护理护士如何构思在压力性损伤管理中该做些什么。
BMC Nurs. 2023 Jun 5;22(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01364-z.
10
Evaluating the consistency with guideline recommendations for diagnosis and management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in non-academic settings.评估在非学术环境中对特发性肺纤维化进行诊断和管理时与指南建议的一致性。
Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 2023 Mar 28;40(1):e2023003. doi: 10.36141/svdld.v40i1.11460.