• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Is health care ready for Six Sigma quality?医疗保健是否已为六西格玛质量做好准备?
Milbank Q. 1998;76(4):565-91, 510. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00106.
2
Systematic Review of the Application of Lean and Six Sigma Quality Improvement Methodologies in Radiology.精益和六西格玛质量改进方法在放射学中应用的系统评价
J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Sep;13(9):1088-1095.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.02.033. Epub 2016 May 19.
3
Using Six Sigma to make a difference in health care quality.运用六西格玛提升医疗保健质量。
Qual Lett Healthc Lead. 2002 Apr;14(4):2-10, 1.
4
Reducing medical errors and adverse events.减少医疗差错和不良事件。
Annu Rev Med. 2012;63:447-63. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-061410-121352. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
5
Working toward quality improvement.致力于质量改进。
Mich Health Hosp. 2001 Mar-Apr;37(2):20-1.
6
Improving quality, minimizing error: making it happen.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2001 May-Jun;20(3):68-81. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.20.3.68.
7
How good is the quality of health care in the United States?美国的医疗保健质量如何?
Milbank Q. 1998;76(4):517-63, 509. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00105.
8
Ancillary services in the health care industry: is Six Sigma reasonable?
Qual Manag Health Care. 2003 Jan-Mar;12(1):53-63. doi: 10.1097/00019514-200301000-00009.
9
The use of six sigma in health care management: are we using it to its full potential?六西格玛在医疗保健管理中的应用:我们是否充分发挥了其潜力?
Qual Manag Health Care. 2013 Jul-Sep;22(3):210-23. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0b013e31829a838e.
10
What makes a good performance indicator? Devising primary care performance indicators for New Zealand.什么是好的绩效指标?为新西兰设计初级保健绩效指标。
N Z Med J. 2004 Apr 2;117(1191):U820.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine learning and lean six sigma for targeted patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy plans.用于容积调强弧形治疗计划的靶向患者特定质量保证的机器学习与精益六西格玛方法
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024 Aug 9;31:100617. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100617. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control (DMAIC) Methodology as a Roadmap in Quality Improvement.定义、测量、分析、改进、控制(DMAIC)方法作为质量改进的路线图。
Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2022 Jun 2;5(2):44-46. doi: 10.36401/JQSH-22-X2. eCollection 2022 May.
3
Closing the Loop: Re-engineering the Assessment and Tracking of Symptoms in Primary Care.闭环管理:重新设计初级保健中的症状评估和跟踪。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Mar;38(4):1054-1058. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07886-7. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
4
Access to Healthcare Facilities and Women's Healthcare Requirements in Urban Areas: A Case Study of Beijing.城市地区的医疗设施可及性和女性医疗保健需求:以北京市为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 21;19(6):3709. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063709.
5
Digital health & low-value care.数字健康与低价值医疗。
Healthc (Amst). 2021 Jun;9(2):100533. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2021.100533. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
6
for Pharmacy Services Quality Improvement-A Bridge to Cross the Quality Chasm.促进药学服务质量改进——弥合质量鸿沟的桥梁。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Jul;26(7):798-816. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.7.798.
7
Decision making tools for managing waiting times and treatment rates in elective surgery.择期手术中管理等待时间和治疗率的决策工具。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 11;19(1):369. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4199-6.
8
Are low and high utilization related to the way GPs manage their practices? An observational study.低利用率和高利用率与全科医生管理其诊所的方式有关吗?一项观察性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Apr 25;19(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0732-7.
9
Medical overuse and quaternary prevention in primary care - A qualitative study with general practitioners.基层医疗中的医疗过度使用与四级预防——一项针对全科医生的定性研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Dec 8;18(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0667-4.
10
"Don't Mind the Gap!" Reflections on Improvement Science as a Paradigm.“别在意差距!” 关于将改进科学作为一种范式的思考
Health Care Anal. 2018 Jun;26(2):124-139. doi: 10.1007/s10728-017-0353-7.

医疗保健是否已为六西格玛质量做好准备?

Is health care ready for Six Sigma quality?

作者信息

Chassin M R

机构信息

Department of Health Policy, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY 10029, USA.

出版信息

Milbank Q. 1998;76(4):565-91, 510. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00106.

DOI:10.1111/1468-0009.00106
PMID:9879303
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2751107/
Abstract

Serious, widespread problems exist in the quality of U.S. health care: too many patients are exposed to the risks of unnecessary services; opportunities to use effective care are missed; and preventable errors lead to injuries. Advanced practitioners of industrial quality management, like Motorola and General Electric, have committed themselves to reducing the frequency of defects in their business processes to fewer than 3.4 per million, a strategy known as Six Sigma Quality. In health care, quality problems frequently occur at rates of 20 to 50 percent, or 200,000 to 500,000 per million. In order to approach Six Sigma levels of quality, the health care sector must address the underlying causes of error and make important changes: adopting new educational models; devising strategies to increase consumer awareness; and encouraging public and private investment in quality improvement.

摘要

美国医疗保健质量存在严重且普遍的问题

太多患者面临不必要服务的风险;错过使用有效护理的机会;可预防的错误导致伤害。像摩托罗拉和通用电气这样的先进工业质量管理从业者致力于将其业务流程中的缺陷频率降低至每百万少于3.4个,这一策略被称为六西格玛质量。在医疗保健领域,质量问题经常以20%至50%的比率出现,即每百万中有20万至50万例。为了达到六西格玛质量水平,医疗保健部门必须解决错误的根本原因并做出重大改变:采用新的教育模式;制定提高消费者意识的策略;鼓励公共和私人对质量改进进行投资。