Lambri Nicola, Dei Damiano, Goretti Giulia, Crespi Leonardo, Brioso Ricardo Coimbra, Pelizzoli Marco, Parabicoli Sara, Bresolin Andrea, Gallo Pasqualina, La Fauci Francesco, Lobefalo Francesca, Paganini Lucia, Reggiori Giacomo, Loiacono Daniele, Franzese Ciro, Tomatis Stefano, Scorsetti Marta, Mancosu Pietro
IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024 Aug 9;31:100617. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100617. eCollection 2024 Jul.
Radiotherapy plans with excessive complexity exhibit higher uncertainties and worse patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) results, while the workload of measurement-based PSQA can impact the efficiency of the radiotherapy workflow. Machine Learning (ML) and Lean Six Sigma, a process optimization method, were implemented to adopt a targeted PSQA approach, aiming to reduce workload, risk of failures, and monitor complexity.
Lean Six Sigma was applied using DMAIC (define, measure, analyze, improve, and control) steps. Ten complexity metrics were computed for 69,811 volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) arcs from 28,612 plans delivered in our Institute (2013-2021). Outlier complexities were defined as >95th-percentile of the historical distributions, stratified by treatment. An ML model was trained to predict the gamma passing rate (GPR-3 %/1mm) of an arc given its complexity. A decision support system was developed to monitor the complexity and expected GPR. Plans at risk of PSQA failure, either extremely complex or with average GPR <90 %, were identified. The tool's impact was assessed after nine months of clinical use.
Among 1722 VMAT plans monitored prospectively, 29 (1.7 %) were found at risk of failure. Planners reacted by performing PSQA measurement and re-optimizing the plan. Occurrences of outlier complexities remained stable within 5 %. The expected GPR increased from a median of 97.4 % to 98.2 % (Mann-Whitney p < 0.05) due to plan re-optimization.
ML and Lean Six Sigma have been implemented in clinical practice enabling a targeted measurement-based PSQA approach for plans at risk of failure to improve overall quality and patient safety.
过于复杂的放射治疗计划具有更高的不确定性以及更差的患者特异性质量保证(PSQA)结果,而基于测量的PSQA工作量会影响放射治疗工作流程的效率。实施机器学习(ML)和精益六西格玛(一种流程优化方法)以采用针对性的PSQA方法,旨在减少工作量、失败风险并监测复杂性。
采用DMAIC(定义、测量、分析、改进和控制)步骤应用精益六西格玛。为我们研究所(2013 - 2021年)交付的28612个计划中的69811个容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)弧计算了十个复杂性指标。异常复杂性被定义为历史分布的第95百分位数以上,并按治疗分层。训练了一个ML模型,以根据弧形的复杂性预测其伽马通过率(GPR - 3%/1mm)。开发了一个决策支持系统来监测复杂性和预期的GPR。识别出有PSQA失败风险的计划,即极其复杂或平均GPR < 90%的计划。在临床使用九个月后评估该工具的影响。
在1722个前瞻性监测的VMAT计划中,发现29个(1.7%)有失败风险。计划制定者通过进行PSQA测量和重新优化计划做出反应。异常复杂性的发生率在5%以内保持稳定。由于计划重新优化,预期的GPR从中位数97.4%增加到98.2%(曼 - 惠特尼p < 0.05)。
ML和精益六西格玛已在临床实践中实施,为有失败风险的计划启用了基于针对性测量的PSQA方法,以提高整体质量和患者安全。