Roberts L, Ahmed I, Hall S, Sargent C, Adams C
Forsch Komplementarmed. 1998;5 Suppl S1:82-86. doi: 10.1159/000057115.
To review the effectiveness of prayer as an additional intervention for those with health problems already receiving standard medical care. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic Searches of Biological Abstracts, CINAHL, The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, EM-BASE, MEDLINE, PsycLIT, and Sociofile were undertaken. All references of articles selected were searched for further relevant trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials of personal, focused, committed and organised intercessory prayer on behalf of anyone with a health problem were considered. Outcomes such as achievement of desired goals, death, illness, quality of life and well-being for the recipients of prayer, those praying and the caregivers were sought. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Studies were reliably selected and assessed for methodological quality. Data were extracted by 4 reviewers working independently. Dichotomous data were analysed on an intention-to-treat basis, and continuous data with over 50% completion rate are presented. MAIN RESULTS: There was no evidence that prayer affected the numbers of people dying from leukaemia or heart disease (OR 0.64, CI 0.32-1.27), or that it decreased coronary care complications (OR 1.05, CI 0.49-2.26) or the time participants stayed in hospital. There were significantly fewer 'intermediat//poor outcomes' for those with heart disease in the prayed-for group (OR 0.49, CI 0.30-0.80), and this finding was robust to some changes in definition. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides no guidance for those wishing to uphold or refute the effect of intercessory prayer on the outcomes studied in the available trials. Therefore, in the light of the best available data, there are no grounds to change current practices. There are very few completed trials of the value of intercessory prayer. The evidence presented so far is interesting enough to justify further study. If prayer is seen as a human endeavour it may or may not be beneficial, and further trials could uncover this. It could be the case that any effects are due to elements beyond present scientific understanding that will, in time, be understood. If any benefit derives from God's response to prayer it may be beyond any such trials to prove or disprove.
回顾祈祷作为一种辅助干预措施,对那些已接受标准医疗护理的健康问题患者的有效性。
对生物学文摘数据库、护理学与健康领域数据库、考克兰对照试验注册库、荷兰医学文摘数据库、医学索引数据库、心理学文摘数据库和社会科学数据库进行电子检索。对所选文章的所有参考文献进行检索,以查找更多相关试验。
纳入代表任何有健康问题的人进行的个人化、针对性、虔诚且有组织的代祷的随机和半随机试验。研究祈祷接受者、祈祷者及护理者的预期目标达成情况、死亡、疾病、生活质量和幸福感等结果。
可靠地选择研究并评估其方法学质量。由4名独立工作的评审员提取数据。二分数据按意向性分析,呈现完成率超过50%的连续性数据。
没有证据表明祈祷会影响死于白血病或心脏病的人数(比值比0.64,可信区间0.32 - 1.27),也没有证据表明祈祷会减少冠心病护理并发症(比值比1.05,可信区间0.49 - 2.26)或缩短参与者的住院时间。在接受祈祷的心脏病患者组中,“中等/不良结果”显著减少(比值比0.49,可信区间0.30 - 0.80),且这一发现对定义的一些变化具有稳健性。
本综述无法为那些希望支持或反驳代祷对现有试验中所研究结果的影响的人提供指导。因此,根据现有最佳数据,没有理由改变当前做法。关于代祷价值的完整试验非常少。目前呈现的证据很有趣,足以证明有必要进一步研究。如果将祈祷视为一种人类行为,它可能有益也可能无益,进一步的试验可能会揭示这一点。有可能任何影响都归因于目前科学尚未理解的因素,而这些因素最终会被理解。如果任何益处源自上帝对祈祷的回应,可能无法通过此类试验来证明或证伪。