Cassina P C, Hauser M, Hillejan L, Greschuchna D, Stamatis G
Department of Thoracic Surgery and Endoscopy, Ruhrlandklinik, Essen, Germany, and the Department of Medical Radiology, Zurich University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999 Feb;117(2):234-8. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(99)70417-4.
Despite modern diagnostic methods and appropriate treatment, pleural empyema remains a serious problem. Our purpose was to assess the feasibility and efficacy of the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the management of nontuberculous fibrinopurulent pleural empyema after chest tube drainage treatment had failed to achieve the proper results.
We present a prospective selected single institution series including 45 patients with pleural empyema who underwent an operation between March 1993 and December 1996. Mean preoperative length of conservative management was 37 days (range, 8-82 days). All patients were assessed by chest computed tomography and ultrasonography and underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic debridement of the empyema and postoperative irrigation of the pleural cavity.
In 37 patients (82%), video-assisted thoracoscopic debridement was successful. In 8 cases, decortication by standard thoracotomy was necessary. There were no complications during video-assisted thoracic operations. The mean duration of chest tube drainage was 7. 1 days (range, 4-140 days). At follow-up (n = 35) with pulmonary function tests, 86% of the patients treated by video-assisted thoracic operation showed normal values; 14% had a moderate obstruction and restriction without impairment of exercise capacity, and no relapse of empyema was observed.
Video-assisted thoracoscopic debridement represents a suitable treatment for fibrinopurulent empyema when chest tube drainage and fibrinolytics have failed to achieve the proper results. In an early organizing phase, indication for video-assisted thoracic operation should be considered in due time to ensure a definitive therapy with a minimally invasive intervention. For pleural empyema in a later organizing phase, full thoracotomy with decortication remains the treatment of choice.
尽管有现代诊断方法和适当治疗,但胸膜腔积脓仍然是一个严重问题。我们的目的是评估电视辅助胸腔镜手术在胸腔闭式引流治疗未能取得理想效果的非结核性纤维脓性胸膜腔积脓管理中的可行性和疗效。
我们呈现了一个前瞻性选择的单机构系列研究,包括1993年3月至1996年12月间接受手术的45例胸膜腔积脓患者。术前保守治疗的平均时长为37天(范围8 - 82天)。所有患者均接受胸部计算机断层扫描和超声检查,并接受电视辅助胸腔镜下脓腔清创及术后胸腔冲洗。
37例患者(82%)电视辅助胸腔镜清创成功。8例患者需要进行标准开胸剥脱术。电视辅助胸腔手术期间无并发症发生。胸腔闭式引流的平均时长为7.1天(范围4 - 140天)。在随访(n = 35)时进行肺功能测试,接受电视辅助胸腔手术治疗的患者中86%显示值正常;14%有中度阻塞和受限但运动能力未受损,且未观察到脓胸复发。
当胸腔闭式引流和纤维蛋白溶解剂未能取得理想效果时,电视辅助胸腔镜清创是纤维脓性脓胸的合适治疗方法。在早期机化阶段,应适时考虑电视辅助胸腔手术的适应证,以确保通过微创干预进行确定性治疗。对于后期机化阶段的胸膜腔积脓,全胸剥脱术仍然是首选治疗方法。