Ariyo A, Hennekens C H, Stampfer M J, Ridker P M
Divisions of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
J Cardiovasc Risk. 1998 Aug;5(4):273-8.
Previously reported data from the Physicians' Health Study indicate that there is no association between lipoprotein (a) level and subsequent risk of myocardial infarction among members of a large cohort of middle-aged men followed up prospectively for an average of 60.2 months.
To investigate whether this null finding is related to the generally favorable lipid profile of the cohort or to randomized assignment of aspirin.
In a follow-up analysis of 296 confirmed cases of myocardial infarction and 296 controls, we evaluated the association between lipoprotein (a) level and cardiovascular risk for those with and without hyperlipidemia as well as for those randomly allocated aspirin treatment and placebo.
For those with total cholesterol levels > or = 200 mg/dl, the age-adjusted smoking-adjusted relative risks of a first myocardial infarction associated with lipoprotein (a) levels above the 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th, and 95th percentiles of the control distribution were 0.9, 1.1, 1.6, 1.7 and 1.0 (all NS; P for trend 0.5). Among those with total cholesterol levels < 200 mg/dl, the adjusted relative risks of myocardial infarction associated with these cutoff points were 0.9, 0.7, 1.2, 0.7, and 1.4 (all NS; P for trend 0.7). Analyses limited to those with total cholesterol levels > or = 240 mg/dl or to men with higher than normal total cholesterol: high-density lipoprotein ratios revealed similar null findings. We observed no significant interaction between total cholesterol and lipoprotein (a) levels for these groups. For those randomly allocated aspirin, the age-adjusted and smoking-adjusted relative risks of myocardial infarction associated with lipoprotein (a) levels above the 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th, and 95th percentile cutoff points were 0.9, 0.9, 1.5, 1.5, and 1.0 (all NS; P trend 0.9). For those randomly allocated placebo, the age-adjusted and smoking-adjusted relative risks of myocardial infarction associated with lipoprotein (a) levels were 0.8, 0.9, 1.4, 1.5, and 1.3 (all NS; P trend 0.9). There was no significant interaction between aspirin and lipoprotein (a) level for any of these groups. Similar null findings were observed in analyses evaluating evidence for there being a trend across increasing quartiles of lipoprotein (a).
These prospective data indicate that neither levels of lipids nor aspirin treatment modified the lack of overall effect of lipoprotein (a) on the risk of a first myocardial infarction in the Physicians' Health Study.
医师健康研究先前报告的数据表明,在对一大群中年男性进行平均60.2个月的前瞻性随访中,脂蛋白(a)水平与随后发生心肌梗死的风险之间没有关联。
研究这一阴性结果是与该队列总体良好的血脂状况有关,还是与阿司匹林的随机分配有关。
在对296例确诊心肌梗死病例和296例对照的随访分析中,我们评估了有或无高脂血症者以及随机分配接受阿司匹林治疗和安慰剂者的脂蛋白(a)水平与心血管风险之间的关联。
对于总胆固醇水平≥200mg/dl者,与脂蛋白(a)水平高于对照分布的第25、50、75、90和95百分位数相关的首次心肌梗死的年龄调整和吸烟调整相对风险分别为0.9、1.1、1.6、1.7和1.0(均无统计学意义;趋势P值为0.5)。在总胆固醇水平<200mg/dl者中,与这些切点相关的心肌梗死调整相对风险分别为0.9、0.7、1.2、0.7和1.4(均无统计学意义;趋势P值为0.7)。限于总胆固醇水平≥240mg/dl者或总胆固醇与高密度脂蛋白比值高于正常者的分析显示了类似的阴性结果。我们在这些组中未观察到总胆固醇与脂蛋白(a)水平之间有显著的相互作用。对于随机分配接受阿司匹林者,与脂蛋白(a)水平高于第25、50、75、90和95百分位数切点相关的心肌梗死的年龄调整和吸烟调整相对风险分别为0.9、0.9、1.5、1.5和1.0(均无统计学意义;趋势P值为0.9)。对于随机分配接受安慰剂者,与脂蛋白(a)水平相关的心肌梗死的年龄调整和吸烟调整相对风险分别为0.8、0.9、1.4、1.5和1.3(均无统计学意义;趋势P值为0.9)。在这些组中,阿司匹林与脂蛋白(a)水平之间均无显著的相互作用。在评估脂蛋白(a)四分位数增加趋势证据的分析中也观察到了类似的阴性结果。
这些前瞻性数据表明,在医师健康研究中,血脂水平和阿司匹林治疗均未改变脂蛋白(a)对首次心肌梗死风险缺乏总体影响的情况。