Suppr超能文献

颈椎推拿:风险与益处

Manipulation of the cervical spine: risks and benefits.

作者信息

Di Fabio R P

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Minnesota, UMHC, Minneapolis 55455, USA.

出版信息

Phys Ther. 1999 Jan;79(1):50-65.

PMID:9920191
Abstract

Manipulation of the cervical spine (MCS) is used in the treatment of people with neck pain and muscle-tension headache. The purposes of this article are to review previously reported cases in which injuries were attributed to MCS, to identify cases of injury involving treatment by physical therapists, and to describe the risks and benefits of MCS. One hundred seventy-seven published cases of injury reported in 116 articles were reviewed. The cases were published between 1925 and 1997. The most frequently reported injuries involved arterial dissection or spasm, and lesions of the brain stem. Death occurred in 32 (18%) of the cases. Physical therapists were involved in less than 2% of the cases, and no deaths have been attributed to MCS provided by physical therapists. Although the risk of injury associated with MCS appears to be small, this type of therapy has the potential to expose patients to vertebral artery damage that can be avoided with the use of mobilization (nonthrust passive movements). The literature does not demonstrate that the benefits of MCS outweigh the risks. Several recommendations for future studies and for the practice of MCS are discussed.

摘要

颈椎整复术(MCS)用于治疗颈部疼痛和肌肉紧张性头痛患者。本文的目的是回顾先前报道的归因于MCS的损伤病例,识别涉及物理治疗师治疗的损伤病例,并描述MCS的风险和益处。对116篇文章中报道的177例已发表的损伤病例进行了回顾。这些病例发表于1925年至1997年之间。最常报道的损伤涉及动脉夹层或痉挛以及脑干病变。32例(18%)病例死亡。物理治疗师参与的病例不到2%,且尚无死亡病例归因于物理治疗师实施的MCS。尽管与MCS相关的损伤风险似乎较小,但这种治疗方式有可能使患者面临椎动脉损伤的风险,而使用松动术(非推力被动运动)可避免这种情况。文献并未表明MCS的益处大于风险。文中讨论了对未来研究和MCS实践的若干建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验