Williams F L, du V Florey C, Mires G J, Ogston S A
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School.
J Public Health Med. 1998 Dec;20(4):422-7. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024797.
The aim of the study was to determine the rates and to describe the risk factors for episiotomy and perineal tears in low-risk primigravidae.
A cross-sectional survey of 101 randomly selected NHS hospitals in the UK was carried out between February 1993 and January 1994. Subjects were 40 consecutive low-risk primigravidae in each hospital. The main outcome measures were number and reasons for episiotomy, and number and degree of perineal tears.
A large proportion of women (83 per cent) experienced some form of perineal trauma. Forty per cent of the women had an episiotomy only, 6 per cent an episiotomy and perineal tear, and 37 per cent perineal or other tears without episiotomy. The main reasons for performing an episiotomy were foetal distress (27 per cent), impending tear (25 per cent) and delay of the second stage of labour (21 per cent). Fifty-nine per cent of women with a delayed second stage had a spontaneous vaginal delivery and 41 per cent required instrumental assistance. The likelihood of having an episiotomy increased with the duration of the second stage of labour, irrespective of type of delivery. Episiotomy rates varied appreciably throughout regions and hospitals in the United Kingdom, ranging from 26 to 67 per cent. There was also a large regional variation in the rates of perineal trauma; generally, high rates of one outcome were associated with low rates of the other. Compared with white women, women from the Indian sub-continent were almost twice as likely and those from the Orient almost five times as likely to have an episiotomy.
The magnitude of the geographical variation suggests a lack of uniformity in indications for performing episiotomies and that guidelines for performing episiotomies may need to be reviewed. The rates of episiotomy in women from the Indian sub-continent and Orient were very high compared with those for white women, and this requires clarification and explanation, as they are contrary to rates experienced in these ethnic groups in other countries.
本研究旨在确定低风险初产妇会阴切开术和会阴撕裂的发生率,并描述其风险因素。
1993年2月至1994年1月期间,对英国101家随机选取的国民健康服务医院进行了横断面调查。每家医院选取40例连续的低风险初产妇作为研究对象。主要观察指标为会阴切开术的数量及原因,以及会阴撕裂的数量和程度。
很大一部分女性(83%)经历了某种形式的会阴创伤。40%的女性仅接受了会阴切开术,6%的女性接受了会阴切开术并伴有会阴撕裂,37%的女性有会阴或其他撕裂但未行会阴切开术。进行会阴切开术的主要原因是胎儿窘迫(27%)、即将发生撕裂(25%)和第二产程延长(21%)。第二产程延长的女性中,59%经阴道自然分娩,41%需要器械辅助。无论分娩方式如何,第二产程持续时间越长,进行会阴切开术的可能性就越大。英国各地区和医院的会阴切开术发生率差异显著,范围在26%至67%之间。会阴创伤发生率在地区间也存在很大差异;一般来说,一种结果的高发生率与另一种结果的低发生率相关。与白人女性相比,来自印度次大陆的女性进行会阴切开术的可能性几乎是其两倍,来自东方的女性则几乎是其五倍。
地域差异的程度表明会阴切开术的指征缺乏一致性,可能需要重新审视会阴切开术的指导原则。与白人女性相比,来自印度次大陆和东方的女性会阴切开术发生率非常高,这需要进行澄清和解释,因为这与这些种族群体在其他国家的发生率相反。