Garway-Heath D F, Ruben S T, Viswanathan A, Hitchings R A
Glaucoma Unit, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London.
Br J Ophthalmol. 1998 Oct;82(10):1118-24. doi: 10.1136/bjo.82.10.1118.
The vertical cup/disc ratio (CDR) has long been used in the assessment of the glaucoma suspect, though the wide range of CDR values in the normal population limits its use. Cup size is related physiologically to disc size and pathologically to glaucomatous damage. Disc size can be measured at the slit lamp as the vertical disc diameter (DD). The ability of the CDR, in relation to DD, to identify glaucomatous optic discs was investigated.
88 normal, 53 early glaucoma, and 59 ocular hypertensive subjects underwent stereoscopic optic disc photography and clinical biometry. Photographs were analysed in a masked fashion by computer assisted planimetry. The relation between vertical cup diameter and DD was explored by linear regression, and expressed in terms of CDR. The upper limit of normal was defined by the 95% prediction intervals of this regression (method 1) and by the upper 97.5 percentile for CDR (method 2). The sensitivity and specificity of CDR to identify an optic disc as glaucomatous was tested with these disc size dependent and disc size independent cut offs in small, medium, and large discs.
The CDR was related to DD by the equation CDR = (-1.31 + (1.194 x DD))/DD. The sensitivity in small, medium, and large discs was 80%, 60%, and 38% respectively for method 1 and 33%, 67%, and 63% respectively for method 2. Specificity was 98.9% (method 1) and 97.7% (method 2).
The CDR, relative to disc size, is useful clinically, especially to assist in identifying small glaucomatous discs.
长期以来,垂直杯盘比(CDR)一直用于青光眼可疑患者的评估,尽管正常人群中CDR值范围较宽限制了其应用。杯的大小在生理上与视盘大小相关,在病理上与青光眼性损害相关。视盘大小可在裂隙灯下测量垂直视盘直径(DD)。研究了与DD相关的CDR识别青光眼性视盘的能力。
88名正常受试者、53名早期青光眼患者和59名高眼压受试者接受了立体视盘摄影和临床生物测量。通过计算机辅助平面测量法以盲法分析照片。通过线性回归探索垂直杯直径与DD之间的关系,并以CDR表示。正常上限通过该回归的95%预测区间(方法1)和CDR的上97.5百分位数(方法2)定义。在小、中、大视盘中,用这些与视盘大小相关和与视盘大小无关的截断值测试CDR识别青光眼性视盘的敏感性和特异性。
CDR与DD的关系方程为CDR = (-1.31 + (1.194 × DD))/DD。方法1在小、中、大视盘中的敏感性分别为80%、60%和38%,方法2分别为33%、67%和63%。特异性分别为98.9%(方法1)和97.7%(方法2)。
相对于视盘大小,CDR在临床上有用,特别是有助于识别小的青光眼性视盘。