Westendorf M L, Dong Z C, Schoknecht P A
Department of Animal Science, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Cook College, New Brunswick 08901-8525, USA.
J Anim Sci. 1998 Dec;76(12):2976-83. doi: 10.2527/1998.76122976x.
This project was undertaken to compare growth, meat quality, and diet digestibility when pigs were fed cafeteria food waste (FW) or a corn/soybean meal (CSM) diet. Cafeteria food waste (36 samples) fed in the growing and finishing experiment averaged 22.4% DM, 21.4% CP, 14.1% ADF, 27.2% ether extract, and 3.2% ash. The first experiment used 50 crossbred pigs randomly assigned to four diets. During the growing phase, pigs fed a CSM diet gained faster (P < .05) than pigs fed FW or FW plus energy supplements. However, the two groups fed FW plus energy supplements (at 25 or 50% of the intake of the CSM diet) gained faster (P < .05) than pigs fed FW alone (.61 and .65 kg/d, respectively, vs .46 kg/d). In the finishing phase, FW plus an energy supplement fed at 50% of the level of CSM intake resulted in gains that did not differ from those of pigs fed the CSM diet (.90 vs .99 kg/d; P > .05). A nutrient digestibility and nitrogen balance trial using eight growing barrows compared FW with the same CSM growing diet fed earlier. Dry matter digestibility was similar for the two diets (P > .05). However, CP digestibility was higher (P < .05) in the FW diet than in the CSM diet (88.2 vs 84.3%). Although the percentage of nitrogen retained was not different between FW and CSM diets (56.0 vs 55.2%; P > .05), the amount of nitrogen retained was greater for pigs fed the CSM diet (29.3 vs. 24.5 g/d; P < .05) because DMI was greater (1.7 vs 1.4 kg/d) for pigs fed CSM compared with FW. At the completion of the finishing experiment, six pigs were selected from both the CSM and FW diets and fed to finishing weight. The pigs were slaughtered, and the pork loins were removed for flavor and texture analysis. A consumer panel rated the meat quality from FW pigs as acceptable and overall flavor comparable to CSM pigs (P > .05). These results indicate that food waste has nutritive value and may be useful in swine diets.
本项目旨在比较猪饲喂自助餐厅食物残渣(FW)或玉米/豆粕(CSM)日粮时的生长性能、肉质和日粮消化率。生长育肥试验中饲喂的自助餐厅食物残渣(36个样本)平均含22.4%的干物质、21.4%的粗蛋白、14.1%的酸性洗涤纤维、27.2%的乙醚提取物和3.2%的灰分。第一个试验使用了50头杂交猪,随机分配到四种日粮。在生长阶段,饲喂CSM日粮的猪比饲喂FW或FW加能量补充剂的猪增重更快(P<0.05)。然而,两组饲喂FW加能量补充剂(分别为CSM日粮摄入量的25%或50%)的猪比单独饲喂FW的猪增重更快(P<0.05)(分别为0.61和0.65千克/天,对比0.46千克/天)。在育肥阶段,以CSM摄入量50%的水平饲喂FW加能量补充剂,增重与饲喂CSM日粮的猪没有差异(0.90对比0.99千克/天;P>0.05)。一项使用八头生长公猪的营养消化率和氮平衡试验,将FW与早期饲喂的相同CSM生长日粮进行了比较。两种日粮的干物质消化率相似(P>0.05)。然而,FW日粮的粗蛋白消化率高于CSM日粮(P<0.05)(88.2%对比84.3%)。虽然FW和CSM日粮之间的氮保留百分比没有差异(56.0%对比55.2%;P>0.05),但饲喂CSM日粮的猪氮保留量更大(29.3对比24.5克/天;P<0.05),因为与FW相比,饲喂CSM的猪干物质采食量更高(1.7对比1.4千克/天)。在育肥试验结束时,从CSM和FW日粮组中各挑选六头猪饲养至出栏体重。猪被屠宰后,取出猪腰进行风味和质地分析。一个消费者小组对FW猪的肉质评价为可接受,总体风味与CSM猪相当(P>0.05)。这些结果表明食物残渣具有营养价值,可能对猪日粮有用。