• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低准确性的疾病风险预测模型能否通过决策支持系统改善医疗保健?

Can low accuracy disease risk predictor models improve health care using decision support systems?

作者信息

Benn D K, Dankel D D, Kostewicz S H

机构信息

University of Florida College of Dentistry 32610-0414, USA.

出版信息

Proc AMIA Symp. 1998:577-81.

PMID:9929285
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2232092/
Abstract

A prototype decision support system has been designed for managing dental caries using a risk assessment model. Caries is a multifactorial disease with risk prediction models having low sensitivity (65%) and moderate specificity (80%) for 2 or more new lesions. These models are inaccurate for targeting resources at high risk people. However, low risk individuals can be more accurately identified. If the activity of early tooth decay lesions, in low risk people, are monitored over time and only lesions beyond 1/3 of the dentin depth are filled, the number of annual fillings may be reduced by 50%. Currently, most US dental schools do not teach risk assessment for caries and encourage early treatment of lesions leading to a repair destruction cycle. The combination of a decision support system with a moderate accuracy specificity risk model for predicting low risk individuals may produce a significant improvement in caries management.

摘要

已设计出一个使用风险评估模型来管理龋齿的原型决策支持系统。龋齿是一种多因素疾病,对于预测2个或更多新发损害,风险预测模型的敏感性较低(65%),特异性中等(80%)。这些模型在针对高风险人群分配资源方面并不准确。然而,低风险个体能够被更准确地识别。如果对低风险人群早期龋齿损害的活动进行长期监测,并且仅对牙本质深度超过1/3的损害进行填充,每年的填充数量可能会减少50%。目前,美国大多数牙科学校不教授龋齿风险评估,而是鼓励对损害进行早期治疗,这导致了修复破坏循环。将决策支持系统与用于预测低风险个体的中等准确性特异性风险模型相结合,可能会在龋齿管理方面产生显著改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c575/2232092/eaa192dcc4f1/procamiasymp00005-0613-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c575/2232092/eaa192dcc4f1/procamiasymp00005-0613-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c575/2232092/eaa192dcc4f1/procamiasymp00005-0613-a.jpg

相似文献

1
Can low accuracy disease risk predictor models improve health care using decision support systems?低准确性的疾病风险预测模型能否通过决策支持系统改善医疗保健?
Proc AMIA Symp. 1998:577-81.
2
Risk assessment - can we achieve consensus?风险评估——我们能达成共识吗?
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;41(1):e64-70. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12026.
3
Variations in caries diagnoses and treatment recommendations and their impacts on the costs of oral health care.龋齿诊断与治疗建议的差异及其对口腔保健成本的影响。
Community Dent Health. 2012 Mar;29(1):25-8.
4
Clinical decision making for caries management in children.儿童龋病管理的临床决策
Pediatr Dent. 2002 Sep-Oct;24(5):386-92.
5
Initial carious lesions: when should they be restored?早期龋损:何时应进行修复?
J Am Dent Assoc. 2000 Dec;131(12):1760-2. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0123.
6
What do we know about how dentists make caries-related treatment decisions?我们对牙医如何做出与龋齿相关的治疗决策了解多少?
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997 Feb;25(1):97-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1997.tb00905.x.
7
[Decision making in cariology].
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2003 Dec;110(12):482-7.
8
When is caries caries, and what should we do about it?龋齿何时才算龋齿,我们又该如何应对?
Quintessence Int. 1998 Oct;29(10):668-72.
9
A survey of pediatric dentists' management of dental caries in children three years of age or younger.一项关于儿科牙医对三岁及以下儿童龋齿管理情况的调查。
Pediatr Dent. 2001 May-Jun;23(3):211-6.
10
Evaluating health gains from restorative dental treatment.评估牙齿修复治疗带来的健康益处。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1994 Aug;22(4):209-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1994.tb01805.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Dental caries risk studies revisited: causal approaches needed for future inquiries.重新审视龋齿风险研究:未来研究需要因果方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009 Dec;6(12):2992-3009. doi: 10.3390/ijerph6122992. Epub 2009 Nov 30.
2
Designing An electronic patient record with multiple real time decision support modules for managing diseases.设计一个带有多个实时决策支持模块的电子病历系统,用于疾病管理。
Proc AMIA Symp. 2000:1168.

本文引用的文献

1
National health spending trends in 1996. National Health Accounts Team.1996年国家卫生支出趋势。国家卫生账户团队。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1998 Jan-Feb;17(1):35-51. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.17.1.35.
2
Standardizing data collection and decision making with an expert system.
J Dent Educ. 1997 Nov;61(11):885-94.
3
What do we know about how dentists make caries-related treatment decisions?我们对牙医如何做出与龋齿相关的治疗决策了解多少?
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997 Feb;25(1):97-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1997.tb00905.x.
4
Caries prediction--state of the art.龋齿预测——当前技术水平
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997 Feb;25(1):87-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1997.tb00904.x.
5
Will modern caries management reduce restorations in dental practice?现代龋病管理会减少牙科临床中的修复治疗吗?
J Am Coll Dent. 1996 Fall;63(3):39-44.
6
Decision-support systems in dentistry.牙科决策支持系统
J Dent Educ. 1996 Jan;60(1):47-63.
7
Periodontal status in the United States, 1988-1991: prevalence, extent, and demographic variation.1988 - 1991年美国的牙周状况:患病率、病变程度及人口统计学差异
J Dent Res. 1996 Feb;75 Spec No:672-83. doi: 10.1177/002203459607502S07.
8
Coronal caries in the primary and permanent dentition of children and adolescents 1-17 years of age: United States, 1988-1991.1988 - 1991年美国1至17岁儿童及青少年乳牙和恒牙的冠龋情况
J Dent Res. 1996 Feb;75 Spec No:631-41. doi: 10.1177/002203459607502S03.
9
Does the cycle of rerestoration lead to larger restorations?修复周期会导致更大的修复体吗?
J Am Dent Assoc. 1995 Oct;126(10):1407-13. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1995.0052.
10
Changing paradigms in restorative dentistry.
J Am Coll Dent. 1995 Fall;62(3):31-6.