Velmahos G C, Demetriades D, Chan L, Tatevossian R, Cornwell E E, Yassa N, Murray J A, Asensio J A, Berne T V
Department of Surgery, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA.
J Trauma. 1999 Jan;46(1):65-70. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199901000-00011.
The early removal of large residual posttraumatic hemothorax by videothoracoscopy is increasingly used to avoid the late sequelae of trapped lung and empyema. Plain chest radiography (CXR) is the tool most frequently used to select such cases for operation. Our recent experience has demonstrated that what appears to be a large retained hemothorax on CXR may turn out to be intrapulmonary or extrapleural conditions not amenable to thoracoscopic removal. Our objective was to evaluate the accuracy of CXR in detecting significant residual hemothorax and compare its clinical value to thoracic computed tomography (CT) when used to select patients for thoracoscopic evacuation.
All patients requiring tube thoracostomy for traumatic hemothorax were prospectively evaluated during a 22-month period (n = 703). Patients who, on the second day after admission, demonstrated opacification on CXR involving more than the costophrenic angle were evaluated by thoracic computed tomography for the presence of undrained fluid. Second-day CXR (CXR2) results were compared with the CT findings. Incorrect interpretation was defined as a difference of more than 300 mL between the two readings. All CXR2 and CT results were reviewed in the same fashion by a radiologist blinded to the surgeon's interpretations. Data on injury mechanism, hemodynamic status, laboratory values, interventions, and outcome were collected prospectively.
Fifty-eight patients had clinically significant opacifications on CXR2. The surgeon's and radiologist's CXR2 interpretations were incorrect in 48 and 47% of the cases, respectively. The CT interpretations by the two specialists were in agreement in 97% of the cases. Management that would have been instituted on the basis of CXR2 findings was changed in 18 cases (31%). Twelve patients (21%) required early thoracoscopic evacuation of undrained collections. There was good correlation between the CT estimation and the thoracoscopically retrieved amount of blood.
Although CXR is useful as a screening tool, it cannot be used to reliably select patients for surgical evacuation of retained traumatic hemothorax. Decision-making should be based on thoracic CT findings.
通过电视胸腔镜早期清除创伤后大量残留血胸越来越多地用于避免肺被包裹和脓胸的晚期后遗症。胸部X线平片(CXR)是最常用于选择此类病例进行手术的工具。我们最近的经验表明,在CXR上看似大量残留血胸的情况,最终可能是不适合胸腔镜清除的肺内或胸膜外情况。我们的目的是评估CXR检测显著残留血胸的准确性,并将其临床价值与胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)用于选择胸腔镜引流患者时进行比较。
在22个月期间对所有因创伤性血胸需要进行胸腔闭式引流的患者进行前瞻性评估(n = 703)。入院第二天CXR显示混浊累及超过肋膈角的患者,通过胸部计算机断层扫描评估是否存在未引流的液体。将第二天的CXR(CXR2)结果与CT结果进行比较。错误解读定义为两次读数之间相差超过300 mL。一位对外科医生的解读不知情的放射科医生以相同方式复查所有CXR2和CT结果。前瞻性收集损伤机制、血流动力学状态、实验室值、干预措施和结果的数据。
58例患者在CXR2上有临床上显著的混浊。外科医生和放射科医生对CXR2的解读分别在48%和47%的病例中不正确。两位专家的CT解读在97%的病例中一致。基于CXR2结果本应采取的管理措施在18例(31%)中发生了改变。12例患者(21%)需要早期通过胸腔镜清除未引流的积液。CT估计值与胸腔镜下回收的血液量之间有良好的相关性。
虽然CXR作为一种筛查工具有用,但它不能可靠地用于选择手术清除残留创伤性血胸的患者。决策应基于胸部CT结果。