Hanson B R
J Commun Disord. 1976 Sep;9(3):235-46. doi: 10.1016/0021-9924(76)90014-9.
The hypothesis that memory for spoken sentences is facilitated by memory for sentence meaning was tested with 16 aphasic and 8 nonaphasic adults. Subjects were asked to make judgments of same or different on pairs of active and passive sentences separated in time. Sentence pairs were either identical in all respects or identical in just grammatical structure, subject-verb-object word order, or meaning. Nonaphasic subjects had higher sentence recognition scores, and larger percentages of meaning preserving responses than aphasic subjects. Aphasic subjects with the highest recognition scores made more meaning preserving responses than aphasic subjects with the lowest recognition scores. The results suggested that memory for spoken sentences is facilitated more by memory for sentence meaning than memory for structure of wording.
针对句子意义的记忆是否有助于口语句子记忆这一假设，对16名失语症成年人和8名非失语症成年人进行了测试。要求受试者对在时间上分开呈现的主动句和被动句对作出相同或不同的判断。句子对要么在各方面都相同，要么仅在语法结构、主谓宾词序或意义上相同。非失语症受试者的句子识别分数更高，且与失语症受试者相比，保留意义的反应比例更大。识别分数最高的失语症受试者比识别分数最低的失语症受试者作出了更多保留意义的反应。结果表明，对于口语句子的记忆，句子意义的记忆比措辞结构的记忆更能起到促进作用。
