• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响在线终端用户文献检索传播的因素。

Factors affecting the diffusion of online end user literature searching.

作者信息

Ash J S

机构信息

Biomedical Information Communication Center, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland 97201-3098, USA.

出版信息

Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1999 Jan;87(1):58-66.

PMID:9934530
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC226524/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to identify factors that affect diffusion of usage of online end user literature searching. Fifteen factors clustered into three attribute sets (innovation attributes, organizational attributes, and marketing attributes) were measured to study their effect on the diffusion of online searching within institutions.

METHODS

A random sample of sixty-seven academic health sciences centers was selected and then 1,335 library and informatics staff members at those institutions were surveyed by mail with electronic mail follow-up. Multiple regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The survey yielded a 41% response rate with electronic mail follow-up being particularly effective. Two dependent variables, internal diffusion (spread of diffusion) and infusion (depth of diffusion), were measured. There was little correlation between them, indicating they measured different things. Fifteen independent variables clustered into three attribute sets were measured. The innovation attributes set was significant for both internal diffusion and infusion. Significant individual variables were visibility for internal diffusion and image enhancement effects (negative relation) as well as visibility for infusion (depth of diffusion). Organizational attributes were also significant predictors for both dependent variables. No individual variables were significant for internal diffusion. Communication, management support (negative relation), rewards, and existence of champions were significant for infusion. Marketing attributes were not significant predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful diffusion of online end user literature searching is dependent on the visibility of the systems, communication among, rewards to, and peers of possible users who promote use (champions). Personal image enhancement effects have a negative relation to infusion, possibly because the use of intermediaries is still seen as the more luxurious way to have searches done. Management support also has a negative relation to infusion, perhaps indicating that depth of diffusion can increase despite top-level management actions.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定影响在线终端用户文献检索使用传播的因素。对归入三个属性集(创新属性、组织属性和营销属性)的15个因素进行测量,以研究它们对机构内部在线检索传播的影响。

方法

选取67个学术健康科学中心的随机样本,然后通过邮件对这些机构的1335名图书馆和信息学工作人员进行调查,并通过电子邮件进行跟进。进行了多元回归分析。

结果

调查的回复率为41%,电子邮件跟进特别有效。测量了两个因变量,即内部传播(传播范围)和注入(传播深度)。它们之间几乎没有相关性,表明它们测量的是不同的方面。对归入三个属性集的15个自变量进行了测量。创新属性集对内部传播和注入均具有显著意义。对内部传播具有显著意义的个体变量是可见性以及形象提升效果(负相关),对注入(传播深度)具有显著意义的个体变量是可见性。组织属性也是两个因变量的显著预测因素。对内部传播而言,没有个体变量具有显著意义。沟通、管理支持(负相关)、奖励以及倡导者的存在对注入具有显著意义。营销属性不是显著的预测因素。

结论

在线终端用户文献检索的成功传播取决于系统的可见性、潜在用户(倡导者)之间的沟通、对他们的奖励以及同伴的影响。个人形象提升效果与注入呈负相关,可能是因为使用中介机构仍被视为进行检索的更奢侈方式。管理支持与注入也呈负相关,这可能表明尽管有高层管理行动,传播深度仍可增加。

相似文献

1
Factors affecting the diffusion of online end user literature searching.影响在线终端用户文献检索传播的因素。
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1999 Jan;87(1):58-66.
2
Organizational factors that influence information technology diffusion in academic health sciences centers.影响学术健康科学中心信息技术传播的组织因素。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997 Mar-Apr;4(2):102-11. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1997.0040102.
3
Factors affecting the diffusion of the Computer-Based Patient Record.影响基于计算机的患者记录传播的因素。
Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp. 1997:682-6.
4
Cross-site study of the implementation of information technology innovations in health sciences centers.健康科学中心信息技术创新实施的跨站点研究。
Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1995:795-9.
5
Survey on the use of information sources in the field of aging.老龄化领域信息来源使用情况调查
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1994 Jan;82(1):30-5.
6
Predictors of nurse adoption of a computerized information system as an innovation.护士采用计算机化信息系统作为一项创新的预测因素。
Medinfo. 1995;8 Pt 2:1335-9.
7
Transitioning to the Internet: results of a National Library of Medicine user survey.向互联网过渡:美国国立医学图书馆用户调查结果
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1997 Oct;85(4):331-40.
8
Web usage mining at an academic health sciences library: an exploratory study.学术健康科学图书馆的网络使用挖掘:一项探索性研究。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2004 Oct;92(4):421-8.
9
Language preferences on websites and in Google searches for human health and food information.网站以及谷歌搜索中关于人类健康和食品信息的语言偏好。
J Med Internet Res. 2007 Jun 28;9(2):e18. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.2.e18.
10
State of the art of expert searching: results of a Medical Library Association survey.专家检索的现状:医学图书馆协会调查结果
J Med Libr Assoc. 2005 Jan;93(1):45-52.

引用本文的文献

1
Revision of BMLA information for authors.作者的生物医学图书馆协会(BMLA)信息修订。
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1999 Jan;87(1):93-4.
2
Expediting the transfer of evidence into practice: building clinical partnerships.加速将证据转化为实践:建立临床伙伴关系。
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 2000 Jul;88(3):247-50.

本文引用的文献

1
Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations.组织创新:个体、组织和情境因素对医院采用技术创新与管理创新的影响。
Acad Manage J. 1981 Dec;24(4):689-713.
2
Management of bibliographic information by Dutch researchers in general practice.
Fam Pract. 1997 Feb;14(1):69-72. doi: 10.1093/fampra/14.1.69.
3
Information retrieval patterns and needs among practicing general surgeons: a statewide experience.普通外科执业医师的信息检索模式与需求:一项全州范围的经验。
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1996 Oct;84(4):490-7.
4
Information-seeking practices of dental hygienists.牙科保健员的信息寻求行为。
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1995 Oct;83(4):446-52.
5
Use of MEDLINE by physicians for clinical problem solving.医生使用医学在线数据库(MEDLINE)解决临床问题。
JAMA. 1993;269(24):3124-9.
6
Adoption of information technology enabled innovations by primary care physicians: model and questionnaire development.基层医疗医生对信息技术驱动创新的采用:模型与问卷开发
Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994:631-5.
7
Information seeking in primary care: how physicians choose which clinical questions to pursue and which to leave unanswered.基层医疗中的信息寻求:医生如何选择哪些临床问题去探究,哪些问题留待解决。
Med Decis Making. 1995 Apr-Jun;15(2):113-9. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9501500203.
8
Can primary care physicians' questions be answered using the medical journal literature?初级保健医生的问题能否通过医学期刊文献得到解答?
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1994 Apr;82(2):140-6.
9
Physical therapists in private practice: information sources and information needs.私人执业的物理治疗师:信息来源与信息需求
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1995 Apr;83(2):196-201.
10
Information needs in office practice: are they being met?门诊医疗实践中的信息需求:是否得到满足?
Ann Intern Med. 1985 Oct;103(4):596-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-103-4-596.