• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良头孢噻肟每日两次给药方案与传统每日三次给药方案治疗小儿下呼吸道感染的临床及药理学评价

Clinical and pharmacological evaluation of a modified cefotaxime bid regimen versus traditional tid in pediatric lower respiratory tract infections.

作者信息

Boccazzi A, Tonelli P, Bellosta C, Careddu P

机构信息

Pediatric Department 1st, University of Milan Medical School, Italy.

出版信息

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1998 Dec;32(4):265-72. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(98)00110-2.

DOI:10.1016/s0732-8893(98)00110-2
PMID:9934543
Abstract

It is generally accepted that the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, either in adults or in pediatric patients, is mainly empirical. Thus, the treatment selection must fulfill both the epidemiological requirements, according to the most frequently described pathogens, and the pharmacological criteria to ensure adequate and prolonged drug concentrations at the infection site, to reach clinical efficacy. Cefotaxime has proven to be effective in this indication when traditionally administered three times daily and, more recently, twice daily, as a result of a re-evaluation of its pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic features. To gain further evidence using this updated dosing schedule, 258 pediatric patients with lower respiratory tract infections were treated with cefotaxime 100 mg/kg/day, administered as a twice daily or three times daily regimen. In the cefotaxime 50 mg/kg twice-daily group (n = 130), a complete resolution of clinical signs and symptoms were observed in 88.5% of patients. Similarly, in the cefotaxime 33.3 mg/kg group (n = 128), 93.6% of patients had a complete resolution of clinical signs and symptoms. Both drug schedules were well tolerated. Pharmacokinetic parameters determined for the two cefotaxime dosing schedules showed comparability. The serum half-life of desacetylcefotaxime was marginally longer than for cefotaxime in both dosage groups (1.64 and 1.36 h for desacetylcefotaxime versus 1.2 and 0.85 h for cefotaxime after 50 mg/kg or 33.3 mg/kg doses, respectively). Results from this study support the use of twice-daily cefotaxime administration for the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections in pediatric patients.

摘要

一般认为,无论是成人还是儿童社区获得性肺炎的治疗主要是经验性的。因此,治疗选择必须满足根据最常描述的病原体的流行病学要求以及药理学标准,以确保在感染部位有足够且持久的药物浓度,从而达到临床疗效。头孢噻肟在传统上每日给药三次时已被证明在该适应症中有效,最近由于对其药代动力学/药效学特征的重新评估,每日给药两次也有效。为了使用这种更新的给药方案获得更多证据,对258例患有下呼吸道感染的儿科患者使用头孢噻肟100mg/kg/天进行治疗,采用每日两次或每日三次的给药方案。在头孢噻肟50mg/kg每日两次组(n = 130)中,88.5%的患者临床体征和症状完全缓解。同样,在头孢噻肟33.3mg/kg组(n = 128)中,93.6%的患者临床体征和症状完全缓解。两种给药方案的耐受性都很好。两种头孢噻肟给药方案的药代动力学参数具有可比性。在两个剂量组中,去乙酰头孢噻肟的血清半衰期略长于头孢噻肟(50mg/kg或33.3mg/kg剂量后,去乙酰头孢噻肟分别为1.64和1.36小时,头孢噻肟分别为1.2和0.85小时)。本研究结果支持每日两次使用头孢噻肟治疗儿科患者的下呼吸道感染。

相似文献

1
Clinical and pharmacological evaluation of a modified cefotaxime bid regimen versus traditional tid in pediatric lower respiratory tract infections.改良头孢噻肟每日两次给药方案与传统每日三次给药方案治疗小儿下呼吸道感染的临床及药理学评价
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1998 Dec;32(4):265-72. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(98)00110-2.
2
Cefotaxime. A reappraisal of its antibacterial activity and pharmacokinetic properties, and a review of its therapeutic efficacy when administered twice daily for the treatment of mild to moderate infections.头孢噻肟。对其抗菌活性和药代动力学特性的重新评估,以及对其每日两次给药治疗轻至中度感染时的治疗效果的综述。
Drugs. 1997 Mar;53(3):483-510. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199753030-00009.
3
Retrospective analysis of the efficacy of cefotaxime sodium dosed twice daily. The Swedish experience.头孢噻肟钠每日两次给药疗效的回顾性分析。瑞典的经验。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1995 May-Jun;22(1-2):163-6. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(95)00087-q.
4
Cefotaxime. A pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the treatment of infections.头孢噻肟。对其用于治疗感染的药物经济学综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Jan;13(1 Pt 1):91-106. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199813010-00009.
5
Cefepime versus cefotaxime in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections.头孢吡肟与头孢噻肟治疗下呼吸道感染的对比研究
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Nov;32 Suppl B:187-93. doi: 10.1093/jac/32.suppl_b.187.
6
Therapeutic options for cefotaxime in the management of bacterial infections.头孢噻肟在细菌感染治疗中的治疗选择。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1995 May-Jun;22(1-2):77-83. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(95)00077-n.
7
Prospective evaluation of twice-daily cefotaxime in the treatment of hospitalized patients with severe infections.每日两次头孢噻肟治疗住院严重感染患者的前瞻性评估
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1995 May-Jun;22(1-2):159-61. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(95)00084-n.
8
Limiting cefotaxime pediatric dosing to adult standards: a pharmacokinetic simulation study.将头孢噻肟儿科给药剂量限制在成人标准:一项药代动力学模拟研究。
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999 Jun;37(6):269-74.
9
Review and reassessment of dosing schedules for cefotaxime in selected medical indications.对选定医学适应症中头孢噻肟给药方案的回顾与重新评估。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1995 May-Jun;22(1-2):147-54. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(95)00103-h.
10
Population Pharmacokinetic Model to Optimize Cefotaxime Dosing Regimen in Critically Ill Children.建立群体药动学模型以优化危重症儿童头孢噻肟给药方案。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2018 Jul;57(7):867-875. doi: 10.1007/s40262-017-0602-9.