Betts R P, Johnston D M, Brown B H
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1976 Jul;39(7):694-700. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.39.7.694.
With the use of a double stimulus technique, nerve fibre velocity range measurements were performed over a single conduction distance in 13 normal subjects and over two conduction distances in another 12 normal subjects. The velocity ranges were found to be dependent upon the conduction distance, owing to unknown refractory period delays. Refractory period values were calculated for the 12 subjects and also direct refractory period distribution measurements were made on 15 normal subjects using a twin stimulus and automatic subtraction technique. Corrections to the velocity range measurements were made upon differing assumptions as to the correlation between refractory period and fibre conduction velocity. It was concluded that a single median value refractory period obtained from the distribution was the best correction to use, based upon the hypothesis that for group A fibres the random scatter of refractory period values is far greater than any variation due to a correlation between refractory period and fibre conduction velocity. It was found important to recognize that calculated values of velocity range are a function not only of the spread of fibre conduction velocities but also of refractory periods.
采用双刺激技术,对13名正常受试者在单一传导距离上以及另外12名正常受试者在两个传导距离上进行了神经纤维速度范围测量。由于未知的不应期延迟,发现速度范围取决于传导距离。为12名受试者计算了不应期值,并使用双刺激和自动减法技术对15名正常受试者进行了直接不应期分布测量。根据关于不应期与纤维传导速度之间相关性的不同假设,对速度范围测量进行了校正。得出的结论是,基于A组纤维不应期值的随机离散远大于因不应期与纤维传导速度之间的相关性而产生的任何变化这一假设,从分布中获得的单个中位数不应期是最佳的校正值。重要的是要认识到,速度范围的计算值不仅是纤维传导速度离散的函数,也是不应期的函数。