Nakashima S, Sakai Y, Take N, Umeda Y
Microbiol Immunol. 1978;22(4):215-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1978.tb00365.x.
it was shown in our previous paper that mice primed with chemically modified bacterial alpha-amylase (BaA), which was neither cross-reactive with anti-BaA antibody nor able to induce a humoral anti-BaA response, developed enhanced responses to a subsequent challenge with native BaA and that the magnitude of the immunological memory was closely related to the priming dose of modified BaA. This paper describes the experimental conditions for induction of delayed hypersensitivity (DH) by modified BaA in relation to the development of immunological memory for antibody response to native BaA. Mice primed with either an intraperitoneal (i.p.) or subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of modified BaA in complete Freunds adjuvant (CFA) developed enhanced anti-BaA as the immunogen and modified BaA as the eliciting antigen, the relationship of anti-BaA responses to a subsequent challenge with BaA. In contrast, when mice were immunized with an s.c. injection of the modified BaA only, a significant level of DH to native BaA could be induced, as measured by the footpad reaction (FPR). The highest degree of DH was observed in mice given 50 micrograms of modified BaA. DH was detectable within 5 days and persisted for 25 days after immunization. In the reciprocal combination of native BaA as the immunogen and modified BaA as the eliciting antigen, the relationship of anti-BaA responses to DH was examined. The primary anti-BaA responses induced by an i.p. injection of large doses of BaA was markedly higher than those induced by an s.c. injection, while DH was exhibited only in mice given s.c. injection of BaA in CFA. With respect to DH to native BaA induced by the modified BaA, it was shown that C3H/He mice were high and C57BL/6 mice were low responders.
我们之前的论文表明,用化学修饰的细菌α-淀粉酶(BaA)进行预处理的小鼠,该修饰的BaA既不与抗BaA抗体发生交叉反应,也不能诱导体液抗BaA反应,但对随后用天然BaA进行的攻击产生了增强的反应,并且免疫记忆的程度与修饰BaA的预处理剂量密切相关。本文描述了与针对天然BaA抗体反应的免疫记忆发展相关的,由修饰BaA诱导迟发型超敏反应(DH)的实验条件。用完全弗氏佐剂(CFA)腹腔内(i.p.)或皮下(s.c.)注射修饰BaA预处理的小鼠,以天然BaA作为免疫原、修饰BaA作为激发抗原时,会产生增强的抗BaA反应,即抗BaA反应与随后用BaA攻击的关系。相反,当仅皮下注射修饰BaA免疫小鼠时,通过足垫反应(FPR)测量,可诱导出对天然BaA的显著水平的DH。在给予50微克修饰BaA的小鼠中观察到最高程度的DH。免疫后5天内可检测到DH,并且持续25天。在以天然BaA作为免疫原、修饰BaA作为激发抗原的反向组合中,研究了抗BaA反应与DH的关系。腹腔注射大剂量BaA诱导的初次抗BaA反应明显高于皮下注射诱导的反应,而仅在皮下注射CFA中BaA的小鼠中表现出DH。关于修饰BaA诱导的对天然BaA的DH,结果表明C3H/He小鼠是高反应者,而C57BL/6小鼠是低反应者。