Suppr超能文献

两种玻璃离子水门汀剪切粘结强度的比较。

A comparison of the shear bond strengths of two glass ionomer cements.

作者信息

Meehan M P, Foley T F, Mamandras A H

机构信息

University of Western Ontario, Faculty of Dentistry, Division of Graduate Orthodontics, London, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999 Feb;115(2):125-32. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70338-0.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the in vitro shear bond strength (in megapascals) and location of bond failure with two light-cured glass ionomer resin systems. One system was a hybrid glass ionomer cement with resin (GC Orthodontics, Aslip, Ill), and the other system a glass-filled resin system (Reliance Orthodontic Products, Inc, Itasca, Ill). These systems, Fuji Ortho LC (GC Orthodontics) and Ultra Band Lok (Reliance), respectively, were compared to a light-cured composite resin. Maxillary premolar brackets (n = 200) were bonded to the facial surface of human premolar teeth. The two glass ionomer resin systems were each evaluated by two protocols, one according to the manufacturers' direction plus a variation of their respective technique. The five distinct groups (n = 40) were stored in 37 degreesC distilled water for 30 days and subjected to thermocycling before shear bond strength testing. The findings indicated that large variations existed between the bond strengths of the materials tested. The laboratory shear bond strength of the glass-filled resin glass ionomer cement (Reliance), whether tested in a dry or moist field, was similar to the composite control with all of the previous materials being significantly (P <.01) higher than both the hybrid glass ionomer cement groups (Fuji Ortho LC). However, the hybrid glass ionomer cement with enamel conditioner demonstrated a clinically acceptable mean megapascal value. The Adhesive Remnant Index values ranged from 0.53 to 1.62. The hybrid glass ionomer cement without enamel conditioning recorded the lowest mean adhesive remnant index score and the lowest mean megapascal score. Although both products are glass ionomer resin systems, their individual chemistries vary; this affects their clinical performance. Clinically, it may be suggested that glass ionomers used in a dry field may be beneficial for orthodontic bonding, and that glass ionomer resin systems used in a moist environment need an enamel conditioner.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定两种光固化玻璃离子树脂系统的体外剪切粘结强度(以兆帕为单位)以及粘结失败的位置。一种系统是含树脂的混合玻璃离子水门汀(GC正畸产品公司,阿斯利普,伊利诺伊州),另一种系统是玻璃填充树脂系统(信赖正畸产品公司,伊塔斯卡,伊利诺伊州)。这两种系统分别为富士正畸LC(GC正畸产品公司)和超强带环粘结剂(信赖公司),并与一种光固化复合树脂进行比较。将上颌前磨牙托槽(n = 200)粘结到人前磨牙的唇面。两种玻璃离子树脂系统均通过两种方案进行评估,一种是按照制造商的说明,另一种是各自技术的变体。将五个不同的组(n = 40)在37℃蒸馏水中储存30天,并在进行剪切粘结强度测试前进行热循环处理。研究结果表明,所测试材料的粘结强度之间存在很大差异。玻璃填充树脂玻璃离子水门汀(信赖公司)的实验室剪切粘结强度,无论在干燥还是潮湿环境下测试,均与复合对照组相似,之前所有材料的粘结强度均显著高于两种混合玻璃离子水门汀组(富士正畸LC)(P <.01)。然而,使用釉质调节剂的混合玻璃离子水门汀显示出临床上可接受的平均兆帕值。粘结剂残留指数值范围为0.53至1.62。未使用釉质调节剂的混合玻璃离子水门汀记录的平均粘结剂残留指数得分最低,平均兆帕得分也最低。尽管这两种产品都是玻璃离子树脂系统,但它们各自化学组成不同;这会影响它们的临床性能。临床上,可能建议在干燥环境中使用的玻璃离子对正畸粘结可能有益,而在潮湿环境中使用的玻璃离子树脂系统需要使用釉质调节剂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验