• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正畸托槽粘结用树脂改良玻璃离子水门汀与复合树脂的剪切粘结强度比较

Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of RMGI and Composite Resin for Orthodontic Bracket Bonding.

作者信息

Yassaei Soghra, Davari Abdolrahim, Goldani Moghadam Mahjobeh, Kamaei Ahmad

机构信息

Associate Professor, Department of Orthodontic Dentistry, Member of Social Determinants of Oral Health Research Center, Dental School, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.

Associate Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, Member of Social Determinants of Oral Health Research Center, Dental School, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.

出版信息

J Dent (Tehran). 2014 May;11(3):282-9. Epub 2014 May 31.

PMID:25628663
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4290756/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of resin modified glass ionomer (RMGI) and composite resin for bonding metal and ceramic brackets.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty-eight human premolars extracted for orthodontic purposes were divided into 4 groups (n=22). In groups 1 and 2, 22 metal and ceramic brackets were bonded using composite resin (Transbond XT), respectively. Twenty-two metal and ceramic brackets in groups 3 and 4, respectively were bonded using RMGI (Fuji Ortho LC, Japan). After photo polymerization, the teeth were stored in water and thermocycled (500 cycles between 5° and 55°). The SBS value of each sample was determined using a Universal Testing Machine. The amount of residual adhesive remaining on each tooth was evaluated under a stereomicroscope. Statistical analyses were done using two-way ANOVA.

RESULTS

RMGI bonded brackets had significantly lower SBS value compared to composite resin bonded groups. No statistically significant difference was observed between metal and ceramic brackets bonded with either the RMGI or composite resin. The comparison of the adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores between the groups indicated that the bracket failure mode was significantly different among groups (P<0.001) with more adhesive remaining on the teeth bonded with composite resin.

CONCLUSION

RMGIs have significantly lower SBS compared to composite resin for orthodontic bonding purposes; however the provided SBS is still within the clinically acceptable range.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较树脂改良玻璃离子水门汀(RMGI)和复合树脂用于粘结金属及陶瓷托槽时的剪切粘结强度(SBS)。

材料与方法

选取88颗因正畸拔除的人类前磨牙,分为4组(每组n = 22)。第1组和第2组分别使用复合树脂(Transbond XT)粘结22个金属和陶瓷托槽。第3组和第4组分别使用RMGI(日本富士正畸LC)粘结22个金属和陶瓷托槽。光固化后,将牙齿置于水中并进行热循环(在5°至55°之间循环500次)。使用万能试验机测定每个样本的SBS值。在体视显微镜下评估每颗牙齿上残留的粘结剂数量。采用双向方差分析进行统计学分析。

结果

与复合树脂粘结组相比,RMGI粘结的托槽SBS值显著更低。在使用RMGI或复合树脂粘结的金属和陶瓷托槽之间未观察到统计学上的显著差异。各组间粘结剂残留指数(ARI)评分的比较表明,各组间托槽脱落模式存在显著差异(P < 0.001),复合树脂粘结的牙齿上残留的粘结剂更多。

结论

用于正畸粘结时,RMGI的SBS显著低于复合树脂;然而其提供的SBS仍在临床可接受范围内。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of RMGI and Composite Resin for Orthodontic Bracket Bonding.正畸托槽粘结用树脂改良玻璃离子水门汀与复合树脂的剪切粘结强度比较
J Dent (Tehran). 2014 May;11(3):282-9. Epub 2014 May 31.
2
Effect of incorporating silica-hydroxyapatite-silver hybrid nanoparticles into the resin-modified glass ionomer on the adhesive remnant index score and shear bond strength of orthodontic metal brackets: An in vitro study.将硅烷化羟基磷灰石-银杂化纳米粒子纳入树脂改良型玻璃离子体对正畸金属托槽黏接残留指数评分和剪切黏结强度的影响:一项体外研究。
Int Orthod. 2023 Sep;21(3):100761. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100761. Epub 2023 May 25.
3
A self-conditioner for resin-modified glass ionomers in bonding orthodontic brackets.一种用于正畸托槽粘结中树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀的自调型材料。
Angle Orthod. 2007 Jul;77(4):711-5. doi: 10.2319/070606-280.1.
4
Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.光固化填充封闭剂对用树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀粘结的金属和陶瓷托槽剪切粘结强度的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Feb;135(2):194-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.12.024.
5
An in vitro comparison of the shear bond strength of a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement and a composite adhesive for bonding orthodontic brackets.树脂增强型玻璃离子水门汀与复合粘结剂用于粘结正畸托槽的抗剪切粘结强度的体外比较
Eur J Orthod. 2005 Oct;27(5):477-83. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cji051. Epub 2005 Jul 25.
6
Shear bond strength of ceramic and metal brackets bonded to enamel using color-change adhesive.使用变色粘合剂将陶瓷和金属托槽粘结到牙釉质上的剪切粘结强度。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2019 Jul-Aug;16(4):233-238.
7
Shear bond strength of new and rebonded orthodontic brackets to the enamel surfaces.新的和重新粘结的正畸托槽与牙釉质表面的剪切粘结强度。
J Orthod Sci. 2018 Jun 6;7:12. doi: 10.4103/jos.JOS_158_17. eCollection 2018.
8
Comparison of the shear bond strength of new and recycled metallic brackets using different adhesive materials : an in vitro study.使用不同粘结材料对新型和回收金属托槽的剪切粘结强度进行比较:一项体外研究。
Eur Oral Res. 2023 May 4;57(2):96-102. doi: 10.26650/eor.20231163180.
9
Comparison of in-vitro bond strengths between resin-modified glass ionomer, polyacid-modified composite resin, and giomer adhesive systems.树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀、聚酸改性复合树脂和聚硅氧烷黏结剂体系体外黏结强度的比较
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Mar;129(3):330.e11-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.11.011.
10
Comparison of bond strength between a conventional resin adhesive and a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive: an in vitro and in vivo study.传统树脂黏合剂与树脂改性玻璃离子黏合剂之间黏结强度的比较:一项体外和体内研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Aug;126(2):200-6; quiz 254-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.06.013.

引用本文的文献

1
Multiparametric performance comparison of dental composites for clear aligner attachments.用于隐形矫治器附件的牙科复合材料的多参数性能比较
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 19;25(1):1206. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06623-w.
2
Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Aesthetic Orthodontic Brackets Bonded to Aged Composite Restorative Resin Materials.美学正畸托槽与老化复合树脂修复材料粘结的剪切粘结强度的比较评估
Polymers (Basel). 2025 Feb 26;17(5):621. doi: 10.3390/polym17050621.
3
Comparison of Three Different Orthodontic Adhesives Bonded to Metallic and Ceramic Brackets: SEM and SEM/EDX Analysis ( Study).三种不同正畸粘合剂与金属和陶瓷托槽粘结的比较:扫描电子显微镜和扫描电子显微镜/能谱分析(研究)
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2024 Mar;58(1):18-29. doi: 10.15644/asc58/1/2.
4
Shear bond strength of a RMGIC for orthodontic bracket bonding to enamel.用于正畸托槽粘结至牙釉质的树脂改良玻璃离子水门汀的剪切粘结强度。
BDJ Open. 2024 Jan 2;10(1):1. doi: 10.1038/s41405-023-00181-5.
5
Comparison of Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Onto the Tooth Enamel of 120 Freshly Extracted Adult Bovine Medial Lower Incisors Using 4 Adhesives: A Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Adhesive, a Composite Adhesive, a Liquid Composite Adhesive, and a One-Step Light-Cured Adhesive.比较四种粘结剂(树脂改良型玻璃离聚物粘结剂、复合树脂粘结剂、液体复合树脂粘结剂和一步光固化粘结剂)在 120 颗新鲜拔除的成年牛下中切牙牙釉质上的正畸托槽粘结强度。
Med Sci Monit. 2022 Dec 21;28:e938867. doi: 10.12659/MSM.938867.
6
Effect of enamel-surface modifications on shear bond strength using different adhesive materials.不同黏接材料对釉质表面改性处理后抗剪黏接强度的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Jun 7;22(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02254-7.
7
Evaluation of a novel fixed-space maintainer made of light-cured acrylic resin: an in vitro study.一种新型光固化丙烯酸树脂制成的固定间隙保持器的评估:一项体外研究。
BDJ Open. 2020 Sep 23;6:17. doi: 10.1038/s41405-020-00046-1. eCollection 2020.
8
Shear Bond Strength of Molar Tubes to Enamel Using an Orthodontic Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement Modified with Amorphous Calcium Phosphate.使用经无定形磷酸钙改性的正畸树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀时磨牙管与牙釉质的剪切粘结强度
Front Dent. 2019 Sep-Oct;16(5):369-378. doi: 10.18502/fid.v16i5.2286. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
9
Formulation and characterization of antibacterial orthodontic adhesive.抗菌正畸粘合剂的配方与表征
Dental Press J Orthod. 2019 Sep 5;24(4):73-79. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.24.4.073-079.oar.
10
Comparison of two different debonding techniques in orthodontic treatment.正畸治疗中两种不同去粘结技术的比较。
Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2017 Nov 8;8(2):71-78. doi: 10.11138/ads/2017.8.2.079. eCollection 2017 Apr-Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of shear bond strength of metallic and ceramic brackets bonded to enamel prepared with self-etching primer.评价自酸蚀底漆处理后釉质粘结的金属和陶瓷托槽的剪切粘结强度。
Eur J Orthod. 2010 Apr;32(2):214-8. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp035. Epub 2009 Jun 9.
2
Shear bond strength of a new high fluoride release glass ionomer adhesive.一种新型高氟释放玻璃离子黏固剂的剪切粘结强度
Angle Orthod. 2008 Jan;78(1):125-8. doi: 10.2319/100405-347.1.
3
A self-conditioner for resin-modified glass ionomers in bonding orthodontic brackets.一种用于正畸托槽粘结中树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀的自调型材料。
Angle Orthod. 2007 Jul;77(4):711-5. doi: 10.2319/070606-280.1.
4
An in vitro comparison of the shear bond strength of a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement and a composite adhesive for bonding orthodontic brackets.树脂增强型玻璃离子水门汀与复合粘结剂用于粘结正畸托槽的抗剪切粘结强度的体外比较
Eur J Orthod. 2005 Oct;27(5):477-83. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cji051. Epub 2005 Jul 25.
5
Effects of thermocycling on the bond strength of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement: an in vitro comparative study.热循环对树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀粘结强度的影响:一项体外对比研究。
Angle Orthod. 2003 Dec;73(6):692-6. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0692:EOTOTB>2.0.CO;2.
6
An ex vivo assessment of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in relation to bonding technique.
J Orthod. 2001 Sep;28(3):207-10. doi: 10.1093/ortho/28.3.207.
7
Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives: composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC.三种粘结剂的粘结强度比较:复合树脂、混合型玻璃离子水门汀和玻璃填充型玻璃离子水门汀。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 Jan;119(1):36-42. doi: 10.1067/mod.2001.110519.
8
Comparison of shear bond strength of three bonding agents with metal and ceramic brackets.三种粘结剂与金属及陶瓷托槽之间的剪切粘结强度比较。
Angle Orthod. 1999 Oct;69(5):457-62. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1999)069<0457:COSBSO>2.3.CO;2.
9
A comparison of the shear bond strengths of two glass ionomer cements.两种玻璃离子水门汀剪切粘结强度的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999 Feb;115(2):125-32. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70338-0.
10
In vitro study of 24-hour and 30-day shear bond strengths of three resin-glass ionomer cements used to bond orthodontic brackets.用于粘结正畸托槽的三种树脂玻璃离子水门汀24小时和30天剪切粘结强度的体外研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Jun;113(6):620-4. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70221-5.