Suppr超能文献

用于患者资料记录的35毫米胶片与数码摄影:是时候做出改变了吗?

35 mm film vs. digital photography for patient documentation: is it time to change?

作者信息

DeLange G S, Diana M

机构信息

University of Florida, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Gainesville, USA.

出版信息

Ann Plast Surg. 1999 Jan;42(1):15-9; discussion 19-20. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199901000-00003.

Abstract

35 mm photography is currently the standard method of documenting a patient's appearance and recording the post-operative changes. With rapidly advancing technology, the digital system is now capable of providing vivid pictures that have multiple advantages over conventional 35 mm photography. Namely, digital pictures are comparatively inexpensive to take, can be stored as digital information, easily retrieved, and immediate viewing and imaging are possible. For many applications in plastic surgery patient documentation, digital photography is now more affordable and flexible than the 35 mm film system. The following is a cost and quality comparison between the two systems.

摘要

35毫米摄影目前是记录患者外貌和术后变化的标准方法。随着技术的迅速发展,数字系统现在能够提供生动的图像,与传统的35毫米摄影相比具有多种优势。也就是说,拍摄数字照片相对便宜,可以作为数字信息存储,易于检索,并且可以立即查看和成像。对于整形外科患者记录中的许多应用,数字摄影现在比35毫米胶片系统更经济实惠且更灵活。以下是两种系统的成本和质量比较。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验