Svedlund J, Sullivan M, Liedman B, Lundell L
Institute of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Internal Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg University, Sweden.
Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Feb;94(2):438-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.874_c.x.
During recent years considerable interest has been focused on quality of life as an additional therapeutic outcome measure in the surgical treatment of gastric carcinoma. However, the long term consequences of gastrectomy and the impact on quality of life of different reconstructive techniques are still a matter of controversy. To broaden the criteria for choice of treatment, we conducted a prospective randomized clinical trial to determine the impact of various gastrectomy procedures on quality of life during a 5-yr follow-up period.
Consecutive patients (n = 64) eligible for curative gastric cancer surgery were randomized to have either total (n = 31) or subtotal (n = 13) gastrectomy or a jejunal S-shaped pouch (n = 20) as a gastric substitute after total gastrectomy. Assessments of quality of life were made on seven occasions during a 5-yr period: within 1 wk before surgery, 3 and 12 months after the surgical intervention, and then once/yr. All patients were interviewed by one of two psychiatrists, who rated their symptoms and introduced standardized self-report questionnaires covering both general and specific aspects of life. The raters were blinded for the patients' group affiliations.
Survival rates were similar in all treatment groups. Patients who had a total gastrectomy continued to suffer from alimentary symptoms, especially indigestion and diarrhea, during the entire follow-up period. However, patients who underwent subtotal gastrectomy had a significantly better outcome already during the first postoperative yr. Patients given a gastric substitute after gastrectomy improved with the passage of time and had an even better outcome in the long run.
To optimize the rehabilitation after gastrectomy, patients' quality of life must be taken into consideration. When subtotal gastrectomy is clinically feasible, this procedure has advantages in the early postoperative period. However, a pouch reconstruction after total gastrectomy should be considered in patients having a favorable tumor status suggesting a fair chance of long term survival.
近年来,生活质量作为胃癌外科治疗中一项额外的治疗效果衡量指标受到了广泛关注。然而,胃切除术的长期后果以及不同重建技术对生活质量的影响仍存在争议。为了拓宽治疗选择标准,我们进行了一项前瞻性随机临床试验,以确定在5年随访期内各种胃切除手术对生活质量的影响。
连续入选的64例适合胃癌根治性手术的患者被随机分为三组:全胃切除术组(n = 31)、次全胃切除术组(n = 13)或全胃切除术后采用空肠S形贮袋作为胃替代物的组(n = 20)。在5年期间进行7次生活质量评估:手术前1周内、手术干预后3个月和12个月,然后每年1次。所有患者均由两名精神科医生之一进行访谈,医生对患者症状进行评分,并采用涵盖生活一般和特定方面的标准化自我报告问卷。评估者对患者所属组别不知情。
所有治疗组的生存率相似。全胃切除术患者在整个随访期内持续存在消化道症状,尤其是消化不良和腹泻。然而,次全胃切除术患者在术后第1年就有明显更好的结果。胃切除术后采用胃替代物的患者随着时间推移有所改善,从长远来看结果更好。
为了优化胃切除术后的康复,必须考虑患者的生活质量。当次全胃切除术在临床上可行时,该手术在术后早期具有优势。然而,对于肿瘤状况良好、提示有较好长期生存机会的患者,全胃切除术后应考虑进行贮袋重建。