Suppr超能文献

冠心病与铁状态:前瞻性研究的荟萃分析

Coronary heart disease and iron status: meta-analyses of prospective studies.

作者信息

Danesh J, Appleby P

机构信息

Clinical Trial Service Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford OX2 6HE, UK.

出版信息

Circulation. 1999 Feb 23;99(7):852-4. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.99.7.852.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies of iron status and coronary heart disease (CHD) have yielded conflicting results. In a systematic review ("meta-analysis"), we quantitatively assessed epidemiological associations reported in prospective studies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Studies were identified by computer-assisted searches of the published literature, scanning of relevant reference lists, hand searching of relevant journals, and discussions with relevant authors. The following was abstracted: size and type of cohort, mean age, mean duration of follow-up, assay methods, degree of adjustment for confounders, and relationship of CHD risk to the baseline assay results. Twelve studies were identified, involving a total of 7800 CHD cases, with several reporting on >1 marker of iron status. For serum ferritin, with 570 CHD cases in 5 studies, comparison of individuals with baseline values >/=200 versus <200 microg/L yielded a combined risk ratio of 1.0 (95% CI, 0.8 to 1.3). For transferrin saturation, with 6194 CHD cases in 5 studies, comparison of individuals in the top third with those in the bottom third of the baseline measurements yielded a combined risk ratio of 0.9 (95% CI, 0.7 to 1.1). Comparisons of individuals in top and bottom thirds of baseline measurements also yielded nonsignificant risk ratios in combined analyses of studies involving total iron-binding capacity (combined risk ratio, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.7 to 1.5), serum iron (0.8; 95% CI, 0.7 to 1.0), and total dietary iron (0.8; 95% CI, 0.7 to 1.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Published prospective studies do not provide good evidence to support the existence of strong epidemiological associations between iron status and CHD.

摘要

背景

关于铁状态与冠心病(CHD)的研究结果相互矛盾。在一项系统评价(“荟萃分析”)中,我们对前瞻性研究中报告的流行病学关联进行了定量评估。

方法与结果

通过计算机辅助检索已发表文献、查阅相关参考文献列表、手工检索相关期刊以及与相关作者讨论来确定研究。提取了以下信息:队列的规模和类型、平均年龄、平均随访时间、检测方法、混杂因素的调整程度以及冠心病风险与基线检测结果的关系。共确定了12项研究,涉及7800例冠心病病例,其中几项研究报告了>1种铁状态标志物。对于血清铁蛋白,在5项研究中的570例冠心病病例中,比较基线值≥200与<200μg/L的个体,合并风险比为1.0(95%CI,0.8至1.3)。对于转铁蛋白饱和度,在5项研究中的6194例冠心病病例中,比较基线测量值处于前三分之一与后三分之一的个体,合并风险比为0.9(95%CI,0.7至1.1)。在涉及总铁结合力(合并风险比,1.0;95%CI,0.7至1.5)、血清铁(0.8;95%CI,0.7至1.0)和膳食总铁(0.8;95%CI,0.7至1.1)的研究综合分析中,比较基线测量值处于前三分之一与后三分之一的个体也得出无显著意义的风险比。

结论

已发表的前瞻性研究没有提供充分证据支持铁状态与冠心病之间存在强流行病学关联。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验