• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Roundtable discussion. Investigational exclusion, clinical trials, and cancer.

作者信息

Goodman C

机构信息

Lewin Group, Fairfax, VA, USA.

出版信息

Oncology (Williston Park). 1998 Nov;12(11A):37-49.

PMID:10028502
Abstract

Clinical trials are critical for developing and testing new treatments for cancer, but a panel of experts agreed that the state of clinical trials in the United States today is a "mess." How did we get into this situation in the first place, and how can we extricate ourselves? Should the federal government assume greater responsibility for funding and overseeing clinical trials and for establishing a standard health benefit package that defines the right to participate in clinical trials? The panel explored whether decisions to exclude patients are based on medical necessity and scientific merit or on the bottom line; whether insurance companies promise more than they can deliver; whether pharmaceutical companies are doing their share; and why lawyers are getting any share. In the end, the participants expressed hope that we, as a society, can get clinical trials back on track to serve their legitimate scientific and medical purposes.

摘要

相似文献

1
Roundtable discussion. Investigational exclusion, clinical trials, and cancer.
Oncology (Williston Park). 1998 Nov;12(11A):37-49.
2
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明更新:癌症易感性基因检测
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2397-406. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.189. Epub 2003 Apr 11.
3
Barriers to clinical trial enrollment: are state mandates the solution?临床试验入组的障碍:州政府强制规定是解决办法吗?
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Jul 21;96(14):1048-9. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh225.
4
Cost-effectiveness and reimbursement in patient care.患者护理中的成本效益与报销
Semin Hematol. 1989 Jul;26(3 Suppl 3):32-45.
5
Viewpoint: hospitals often play important role as intermediaries of patients in clinical research programs.
Patient Care Manag. 2002 Jun;17(9):1, 4-6.
6
Lessons learned from independent central review.独立中央审查的经验教训。
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):268-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.031.
7
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
8
Clinical trials face heightened scrutiny as science and commerce appear to merge.随着科学与商业似乎相互融合,临床试验面临着更严格的审查。
J Biolaw Bus. 2001;4(4):23-32.
9
Third party reimbursement for participation in cancer clinical trials: a proposal for legislation.
J Contemp Health Law Policy. 2000 Summer;16(2):305-54.
10
Patient care cancer clinical trials at the National Cancer Institute: a resource for payers and providers.美国国立癌症研究所的癌症临床试验患者护理:供支付方和医疗服务提供者参考的资源。
Manag Care Q. 2002 Winter;10(1):33-7.

引用本文的文献

1
A descriptive analysis of state legislation and policy addressing clinical trials participation.关于临床试验参与的州立法和政策的描述性分析。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2009 May;20(2 Suppl):24-39. doi: 10.1353/hpu.0.0156.