• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Clinical guidelines: developing guidelines.临床指南：制定指南。
BMJ. 1999 Feb 27;318(7183):593-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7183.593.
2
The role of group decision making processes in the creation of clinical guidelines.群体决策过程在临床指南制定中的作用。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2011 Aug;23(4):358-64. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2011.606539.
3
Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations.将资源使用考量纳入分级建议中。
BMJ. 2008 May 24;336(7654):1170-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39504.506319.80.
4
[Can clinical practice guidelines lead astray?].临床实践指南会误入歧途吗？
Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2007 Apr;117(4):12-5.
5
The potential influence of small group processes on guideline development.小组过程对指南制定的潜在影响。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2001 May;7(2):165-73. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2001.00272.x.
6
Comparison of international guideline programs to evaluate and update the Dutch program for clinical guideline development in physical therapy.国际指南项目与荷兰物理治疗临床指南制定项目评估及更新的比较。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Nov 23;7:191. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-191.
7
A Fine Balance: Developing Clinical Practice Guidelines in Areas Where Evidence is Lacking.微妙的平衡：在缺乏证据的领域制定临床实践指南
Semin Dial. 2015 Nov-Dec;28(6):654-6. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12414. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
8
GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: Clinical practice guidelines.GRADE证据到决策（EtD）框架：一种用于做出明智医疗选择的系统且透明的方法。2：临床实践指南。
BMJ. 2016 Jun 30;353:i2089. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2089.
9
Updating evidence-based clinical guidelines.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002 Apr;7(2):98-103. doi: 10.1258/1355819021927746.
10
A meta schema for evidence information in clinical practice guidelines as a basis for decision-making.作为决策基础的临床实践指南中证据信息的元模式。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;129(Pt 2):925-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacotherapy for obesity management in adults: 2025 clinical practice guideline update.成人肥胖管理的药物治疗：2025年临床实践指南更新
CMAJ. 2025 Aug 10;197(27):E797-E809. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.250502.
2
Dr. LLM Will See You Now: The Ability of ChatGPT to Provide Geographically Tailored Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance Recommendations.大语言模型医生现在为您服务：ChatGPT提供针对不同地理位置的结直肠癌筛查和监测建议的能力。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 18;14(14):5101. doi: 10.3390/jcm14145101.
3
Changes in Practitioners' Attitudes toward the Recommendations for Clinical Questions of the Japanese Guideline for Management of Hyperuricemia and Gout, Third Edition between 2018 and 2020 in the Questionnaire's Surveys: Involving Their Attitude toward the New Questionnaires in 2020.2018年至2020年问卷调查中从业者对《日本高尿酸血症和痛风管理指南》第三版临床问题推荐意见的态度变化：涉及他们对2020年新问卷的态度
JMA J. 2025 Apr 28;8(2):470-478. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2024-0399. Epub 2025 Mar 21.
4
High-precision information retrieval for rapid clinical guideline updates.用于快速更新临床指南的高精度信息检索。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Apr 27;8(1):227. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01648-5.
5
A comparison and AGREE II analysis of the revised Society for Vascular Surgery/American Venous Forum/American Vein and Lymphatic Society and European Society for Vascular Surgery clinical practice guidelines in the management of varicose veins.血管外科学会/美国静脉论坛/美国静脉与淋巴学会和欧洲血管外科学会修订的静脉曲张管理临床实践指南的比较及AGREE II分析
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2025 Mar 26;13(4):102238. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2025.102238.
6
Consensus document on the management of wound closure in orthopaedic surgery.骨科手术伤口闭合管理共识文件。
EFORT Open Rev. 2025 Feb 3;10(2):82-94. doi: 10.1530/EOR-24-0002. Print 2025 Feb 1.
7
Developing a Diagnostic Algorithm for Identifying Vestibular Neuronitis in Acute Dizziness: An Overview of Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, and Evidence-Based Guidelines for Diagnostic Approaches.开发用于识别急性头晕中前庭神经炎的诊断算法：流行病学、发病机制概述及基于证据的诊断方法指南
Cureus. 2025 Jan 28;17(1):e78126. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78126. eCollection 2025 Jan.
8
Exploring the Interplay of Sleep and Nicotine Vaping in Adolescents: An Evidence-Based Narrative Review.探索青少年睡眠与尼古丁电子烟的相互作用：基于证据的叙述性综述。
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2025 Feb 3;55(2):60-74.
9
Conducting pairwise and network meta-analyses in updated and living systematic reviews: a scoping review protocol.在更新的和动态的系统评价中进行成对和网络荟萃分析：一项范围综述方案
JBI Evid Synth. 2025 Mar 1;23(3):527-535. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-24-00279. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
10
Mobile health applications for older people in Asia: protocol for a systematic review of end-user perceptions and recommendations.亚洲老年人移动健康应用：关于终端用户认知与建议的系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 9;15(1):e092089. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092089.

本文引用的文献

1
Are nonspecific practice guidelines potentially harmful? A randomized comparison of the effect of nonspecific versus specific guidelines on physician decision making.非特异性实践指南是否有潜在危害？非特异性指南与特异性指南对医生决策影响的随机对照比较。
Health Serv Res. 2000 Mar;34(7):1429-48.
2
Clinical guidelines: using clinical guidelines.临床指南：使用临床指南。
BMJ. 1999 Mar 13;318(7185):728-30. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7185.728.
3
Assessing the predictive validity of the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method criteria for performing carotid endarterectomy.评估兰德/加州大学洛杉矶分校（RAND/UCLA）颈动脉内膜切除术适宜性方法标准的预测效度。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1998 Fall;14(4):707-27. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300012022.
4
Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?随机试验报告的质量会影响在荟萃分析中报告的干预效果估计值吗？
Lancet. 1998 Aug 22;352(9128):609-13. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)01085-X.
5
Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German.发表于英文和德文期刊的随机对照试验中的语言偏见。
Lancet. 1997 Aug 2;350(9074):326-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)02419-7.
6
Evaluating the use of the appropriateness method in the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Clinical Practice Guideline Development process.评估卫生保健政策与研究机构临床实践指南制定过程中适宜性方法的使用情况。
Health Serv Res. 1996 Oct;31(4):453-68.
7
Variations by specialty in physician ratings of the appropriateness and necessity of indications for procedures.不同专业的医生对手术指征的适当性和必要性的评分差异。
Med Care. 1996 Jun;34(6):512-23. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199606000-00002.
8
Selecting the language of the publications included in a meta-analysis: is there a Tower of Babel bias?选择纳入荟萃分析的出版物的语言：是否存在巴别塔偏差？
J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 Jan;48(1):159-63. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)00098-b.
9
Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials.偏倚的实证证据。与对照试验中治疗效果估计相关的方法学质量维度。
JAMA. 1995 Feb 1;273(5):408-12. doi: 10.1001/jama.273.5.408.
10
Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews.为系统评价识别相关研究。
BMJ. 1994 Nov 12;309(6964):1286-91. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6964.1286.

Clinical guidelines: developing guidelines.

作者信息

Shekelle P G, Woolf S H, Eccles M, Grimshaw J

机构信息

West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical Center (111G), 11301 Wilshire Blvd, CA 90073, USA.

出版信息

BMJ. 1999 Feb 27;318(7183):593-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7183.593.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.318.7183.593
PMID:10037645
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1115034/
Abstract
摘要