Suppr超能文献

月经周期模式与生育能力:对295对计划首次怀孕的夫妇的妊娠及早期胚胎丢失情况进行的前瞻性随访研究。

Menstrual cycle pattern and fertility: a prospective follow-up study of pregnancy and early embryonal loss in 295 couples who were planning their first pregnancy.

作者信息

Kolstad H A, Bonde J P, Hjøllund N H, Jensen T K, Henriksen T B, Ernst E, Giwercman A, Skakkebaek N E, Olsen J

机构信息

Department of Occupational Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 1999 Mar;71(3):490-6. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00474-9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To characterize how the menstrual cycle pattern relates to fertility regardless of potential biases caused by inappropriate coital timing during the menstrual cycle or early embryonal loss.

DESIGN

Prospective follow-up study.

SETTING

Healthy couples recruited throughout Denmark.

PATIENT(S): Two hundred ninety-five couples who were planning their first pregnancy were followed up from the discontinuation of birth control until a pregnancy was recognized within six menstrual cycles. Early embryonal losses were detected by changes in urinary hCG levels.

INTERVENTION(S): None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The probability of pregnancy occurring within one menstrual cycle (fecundity).

RESULT(S): In women who had a cycle length that differed by >10 days from the usual cycle length, fecundity was approximately 25% that of women who had no variation (odds ratio 0.25, 95% confidence interval 0.09-0.68). When the combined effect of cycle variation and cycle length was assessed, cycle variation was a persistent strong predictor of fecundity.

CONCLUSION(S): The mechanisms of the present findings probably are female functional disturbances in ovulation, conception, implantation, or sustained pregnancy, linked with variable menstrual cycle length. Thus, identification of medical and environmental causes of abnormal menstrual cycle patterns may provide clues to the causes of infertility. Moreover, the menstrual cycle pattern also should be taken into consideration in the clinical decision-making process.

摘要

目的

描述月经周期模式与生育能力之间的关系,而不考虑月经周期中不当性交时间或早期胚胎丢失所导致的潜在偏差。

设计

前瞻性随访研究。

地点

在丹麦各地招募的健康夫妇。

患者

295对计划首次怀孕的夫妇,从停止避孕开始随访,直至在六个月经周期内确认怀孕。通过尿hCG水平的变化检测早期胚胎丢失情况。

干预措施

无。

主要观察指标

一个月经周期内怀孕的概率(生育力)。

结果

月经周期长度与正常周期长度相差超过10天的女性,其生育力约为无周期变化女性的25%(比值比0.25,95%置信区间0.09 - 0.68)。当评估周期变化和周期长度的综合影响时,周期变化是生育力的一个持续的强预测因素。

结论

本研究结果的机制可能是女性在排卵、受孕、着床或维持妊娠方面的功能紊乱,与月经周期长度的变化有关。因此,识别月经周期模式异常的医学和环境原因可能为不孕原因提供线索。此外,在临床决策过程中也应考虑月经周期模式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验