Pittet D, Mourouga P, Perneger T V
University of Geneva Medical School and University of Geneva Hospitals, Switzerland.
Ann Intern Med. 1999 Jan 19;130(2):126-30. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-2-199901190-00006.
Transmission of microorganisms from the hands of health care workers is the main source of cross-infection in hospitals and can be prevented by handwashing.
To identify predictors of noncompliance with handwashing during routine patient care.
Observational study.
Teaching hospital in Geneva, Switzerland.
Nurses (66%), physicians (10%), nursing assistants (13%), and other health care workers (11%).
Compliance with handwashing.
In 2834 observed opportunities for handwashing, average compliance was 48%. In multivariate analysis, noncompliance was higher among physicians (odds ratio [OR], 2.8 [95% CI, 1.9 to 4.1]), nursing assistants (OR, 1.3 [CI, 1.0 to 1.6]), and other health care workers (OR, 2.1 [CI, 1.4 to 3.2]) than among nurses and was lowest on weekends (OR, 0.6 [CI, 0.4 to 0.8]). Noncompliance was higher in intensive care than in internal medicine units (OR, 2.0 [CI, 1.3 to 3.1]), during procedures that carry a high risk for contamination (OR, 1.8 [CI, 1.4 to 2.4]), and when intensity of patient care was high (compared with < or = 20 opportunities for handwashing per hour of care, 21 to 40 opportunities: OR, 1.3 [CI, 1.0 to 1.7]; 41 to 60 opportunities: OR, 2.1 [CI, 1.5 to 2.9]; and > 60 opportunities: OR, 2.1 [CI, 1.3 to 3.5]).
Compliance with handwashing was moderate. Variation across hospital ward and type of health care worker suggests that targeted educational programs may be useful. Even though observational data cannot prove causality, the association between noncompliance and intensity of care suggests that understaffing may decrease quality of patient care.
医护人员手部传播微生物是医院交叉感染的主要来源,洗手可预防这种情况。
确定常规患者护理期间不遵守洗手规定的预测因素。
观察性研究。
瑞士日内瓦的教学医院。
护士(66%)、医生(10%)、护理助理(13%)和其他医护人员(11%)。
洗手依从性。
在观察到的2834次洗手机会中,平均依从率为48%。多因素分析显示,医生(优势比[OR],2.8[95%可信区间,1.9至4.1])、护理助理(OR,1.3[可信区间,1.0至1.6])和其他医护人员(OR,2.1[可信区间,1.4至3.2])的不依从率高于护士,且在周末最低(OR,0.6[可信区间,0.4至0.8])。重症监护病房的不依从率高于内科病房(OR,2.0[可信区间,1.3至3.1]),在有高污染风险的操作期间(OR,1.8[可信区间,1.4至2.4]),以及患者护理强度高时(与每小时护理<或=20次洗手机会相比,21至40次机会:OR,1.3[可信区间,1.0至1.7];41至60次机会:OR,2.1[可信区间,1.5至2.9];>60次机会:OR,2.1[可信区间,1.3至3.5])。
洗手依从性中等。不同医院病房和医护人员类型之间的差异表明,有针对性的教育项目可能有用。尽管观察性数据不能证明因果关系,但不依从与护理强度之间的关联表明人员不足可能会降低患者护理质量。