Tilley B C, Vernon S W, Myers R, Glanz K, Lu M, Hirst K, Kristal A R
Department of Biostatistics and Research Epidemiology, Henry Ford Health Sciences Center, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Prev Med. 1999 Mar;28(3):276-83. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0427.
The Next Step Trial was a randomized trial of worksite colorectal cancer screening promotion and nutrition interventions for automobile industry employees at increased risk of colorectal cancer. Interventions were tested at 28 worksites with 5,042 employees. This report describes results of the screening promotion intervention.
Worksites randomized to the control group received a standard program including rectal examination, fecal occult blood testing, and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Intervention worksites received an enhanced program (i.e., standard program plus an educational booklet/telephone call). Compliance (i.e., completion of all recommended screening examinations) and coverage (i.e., completion of at least one screening examination), the primary and secondary outcomes, were measured over 2 years.
In the 2 years prior to baseline, 61% of employees had been screened. After random assignment, baseline differences in several employee characteristics and worksite screening procedures were detected, including more past history of screening in control worksites. After adjusting for differences, we found modest, but higher, compliance and coverage in intervention compared with control worksites (odds ratio [95% confidence limits] = 1.46 [1.1-2.0] and 1.33 [1.1, 1.6], respectively).
Adding a personally tailored behavioral intervention to a standard colorectal cancer screening program can promote continued employee participation in screening as measured by compliance. Further research is needed to assess intervention effects in other populations.
“下一步试验”是一项针对患结直肠癌风险增加的汽车行业员工的工作场所结直肠癌筛查推广及营养干预的随机试验。在28个工作场所对5042名员工进行了干预测试。本报告描述了筛查推广干预的结果。
随机分配至对照组的工作场所接受包括直肠检查、粪便潜血检测和乙状结肠镜检查的标准项目。干预工作场所接受强化项目(即标准项目加上一本教育手册/一通电话)。在2年时间里测量了主要和次要结果,即依从性(即完成所有推荐的筛查检查)和覆盖率(即完成至少一项筛查检查)。
在基线前的2年里,61%的员工接受了筛查。随机分配后,检测到员工的几个特征和工作场所筛查程序存在基线差异,包括对照组工作场所更多的既往筛查史。在对差异进行调整后,我们发现与对照组工作场所相比,干预组的依从性和覆盖率适度但更高(优势比[95%置信区间]分别为1.46[1.1, 2.0]和1.33[1.1, 1.6])。
在标准的结直肠癌筛查项目中增加个性化的行为干预可以促进员工持续参与筛查,这一点通过依从性来衡量。需要进一步研究以评估在其他人群中的干预效果。