• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Musculoskeletal function assessment: reference values for patient and non-patient samples.

作者信息

Engelberg R, Martin D P, Agel J, Swiontkowski M F

机构信息

Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.

出版信息

J Orthop Res. 1999 Jan;17(1):101-9. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100170116.

DOI:10.1002/jor.1100170116
PMID:10073654
Abstract

Although researchers and clinicians are encouraged to use health-status questionnaires to evaluate, monitor, and modify care, their use is hindered by the lack of reference values. Without reference values, it is difficult to interpret or evaluate questionnaire scores. In this paper, we present reference values for the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment, a 101-item health-status questionnaire designed and validated for patients with a broad range of musculoskeletal disorders. We describe reference values for two samples: non-patients (n = 123) and patients with isolated extremity injuries (n = 274). For the non-patient sample, descriptive statistics are presented by age and gender, measured at one point in time. For the patient sample, descriptive statistics are provided for seven Orthopaedic Trauma Association/AO diagnostic groups, measured at two points in time. Reference values for changes in the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment total score are described for patients 3 and 9 months and 6 and 12 months after injury. The total scores by post-injury interval, across the diagnostic groups, are significantly better at follow-up than at baseline (p = 0.00). Reference values for changes in total scores are also described in terms of these diagnostic groups across post-injury intervals. Musculoskeletal Function Assessment total scores for Orthopaedic Trauma Association/AO diagnostic groups are significantly better at follow-up than at baseline (p < 0.03). Changes in the total score are also tested for responsiveness with use of standardized response means. Large effects are demonstrated for patients completing the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment at 3 and 9 months (1.03), and small effects are demonstrated for those completing it at 6 and 12 months (0.49). Moderate and large effects are demonstrated for Orthopaedic Trauma Association/AO diagnostic groups across post-injury intervals.

摘要

相似文献

1
Musculoskeletal function assessment: reference values for patient and non-patient samples.
J Orthop Res. 1999 Jan;17(1):101-9. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100170116.
2
Outcomes of patients with orthopaedic trauma admitted to level 1 trauma centres.入住一级创伤中心的骨科创伤患者的治疗结果。
ANZ J Surg. 2006 Jul;76(7):600-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03785.x.
3
Development of a musculoskeletal extremity health status instrument: the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment instrument.肌肉骨骼肢体健康状况评估工具的开发:肌肉骨骼功能评估工具
J Orthop Res. 1996 Mar;14(2):173-81. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100140203.
4
[Translation and validation of a French version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)].《青年躁狂评定量表(YMRS)法语版的翻译与验证》
Encephale. 2003 Nov-Dec;29(6):499-505.
5
Pediatric outcomes data collection instrument scores in ambulatory children with cerebral palsy: an analysis by age groups and severity level.门诊脑瘫患儿的儿科结局数据收集工具评分:按年龄组和严重程度分析
J Pediatr Orthop. 2008 Jan-Feb;28(1):97-102. doi: 10.1097/bpo.0b013e31815a60e6.
6
Preinjury status: are orthopaedic trauma patients different than the general population?受伤前状况:骨科创伤患者与普通人群有差异吗?
J Orthop Trauma. 2007 Apr;21(4):223-8. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31803eb13c.
7
Interpretation of quality of life scores in multiple myeloma by comparison with a reference population and assessment of the clinical importance of score differences.通过与参考人群比较解读多发性骨髓瘤的生活质量评分,并评估评分差异的临床重要性。
Eur J Haematol. 2004 Mar;72(3):172-80. doi: 10.1046/j.0902-4441.2003.00195.x.
8
The Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment Questionnaire (SMFA): cross-cultural adaptation, validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Swedish SMFA (SMFA-Swe).简短肌肉骨骼功能评估问卷(SMFA):瑞典版SMFA(SMFA-Swe)的跨文化调适、效度、信度及反应度
Acta Orthop Scand. 2003 Dec;74(6):756-63. doi: 10.1080/00016470310018324.
9
[Validation of the Hannover Score for Polytrauma Outcome (HASPOC) in a sample of 170 polytrauma patients and a comparison with the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey].[对170例多发伤患者样本进行的多发伤结局汉诺威评分(HASPOC)验证及与12项简短健康调查问卷的比较]
Chirurg. 2003 Apr;74(4):361-9. doi: 10.1007/s00104-003-0621-y.
10
The mind does matter: Psychological and physical recovery after musculoskeletal trauma.
J Trauma. 2006 Dec;61(6):1408-14. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000197562.34651.df.

引用本文的文献

1
Functional outcomes more than 5 years following acetabulum fracture.髋臼骨折5年以上的功能预后
OTA Int. 2022 Feb 28;5(1):e173. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000173. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
Surgical Versus Nonsurgical Management of Acetabular Fractures With Associated Patterns in Elderly Patients: Factors Affecting Outcomes.老年患者髋臼骨折伴相关类型的手术与非手术治疗:影响结局的因素。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2022 Mar 2;6(3):e22.00014. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-22-00014.
3
Comparison of Generic, Musculoskeletal-Specific, and Foot and Ankle-Specific Outcome Measures Over Time in Tibial Plafond Fractures.
胫骨平台骨折患者通用、肌肉骨骼特异性以及足踝特异性疗效指标随时间的比较
Foot Ankle Orthop. 2019 Nov 6;4(4):2473011419884008. doi: 10.1177/2473011419884008. eCollection 2019 Oct.
4
Comparing the responsiveness of a generic and a musculoskeletal specific functional outcome measure in orthopaedic patients with operative fixation of pelvic ring, acetabulum, or tibia fractures: a comparison between single injury and multiply injured patients.比较普通功能结局测量指标与肌肉骨骼特异性功能结局测量指标在接受骨盆环、髋臼或胫骨骨折手术固定的骨科患者中的反应性:单处损伤与多处损伤患者的比较
OTA Int. 2021 Mar 24;4(2):e126. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000126. eCollection 2021 Jun.
5
Ankle fractures in patients over age 55 years: Predictors of functional outcome.55岁以上患者的踝关节骨折:功能预后的预测因素。
OTA Int. 2020 Jul 27;3(3):e080. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000080. eCollection 2020 Sep.
6
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Sports Medicine: A Concise Resource for Clinicians and Researchers.运动医学中的患者报告结局测量:临床医生和研究人员的简明资源。
J Athl Train. 2020 Apr;55(4):390-408. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-171-19. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
7
The Military Extremity Trauma Amputation/Limb Salvage (METALS) Study: Outcomes of Amputation Compared with Limb Salvage Following Major Upper-Extremity Trauma.军事创伤截肢/肢体保全(METALS)研究:上肢严重创伤后截肢与肢体保全的结果比较。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Aug 21;101(16):1470-1478. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00970.
8
Step Activity After Surgical Treatment of Ankle Arthritis.术后踝关节关节炎的处理步骤。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Jul 3;101(13):1177-1184. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00511.
9
The Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment: a study of the reliability, construct validity and responsiveness in patients sustaining trauma.短式肌肉骨骼功能评估:创伤患者的可靠性、结构有效性和反应性研究。
Clin Rehabil. 2019 May;33(5):923-935. doi: 10.1177/0269215519828152. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
10
Normal population reference values for the Oxford and Harris Hip Scores - electronic data collection and its implications for clinical practice.牛津髋关节评分和哈里斯髋关节评分的正常人群参考值——电子数据收集及其对临床实践的影响。
Hip Int. 2017 Jul 25;27(4):389-396. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000465. Epub 2016 Nov 15.