Campbell M, Young P I, Bateman D N, Smith J M, Thomas S H
Regional Drug and Therapeutics Centre, Wolfson Unit, Newcastle upon Tyne.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1999 Jan;47(1):13-22. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1999.00849.x.
Long-term drug treatment of schizophrenia with conventional antipsychotics has limitations: an estimated quarter to one third of patients are treatment-resistant; conventional antipsychotics have only a modest impact upon negative symptoms (poverty of thought, social withdrawal and loss of affect); and adverse effects, particularly extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). Newer, so-called atypical, antipsychotics such as olanzapine, risperidone, sertindole and clozapine (an old drug which was re-introduced in 1990) are claimed to address these limitations. Atypical agents are, at a minimum, at least as effective as conventional drugs such as haloperidol. They also cause substantially fewer extrapyramidal symptoms. However, some other adverse effects are more common than with conventional drugs. For example, clozapine carries a significant risk of serious blood disorders, for which special monitoring is mandatory; it also causes troublesome drowsiness and increased salivation more often than conventional agents. Some atypical agents cause more weight gain or QT prolongation than older agents. The choice of therapy is, therefore, not straightforward. At present, atypical agents represent an advance for patients with severe or intolerable EPS. Most published evidence exists to support the use of clozapine, which has also been shown to be effective in schizophrenia refractory to conventional agents. However, the need for compliance with blood count monitoring and its sedative properties make careful patient selection important. The extent of any additional direct benefit offered by atypical agents on negative symptoms is not yet clear. The lack of a depot formulation for atypical drugs may pose a significant practical problem. To date, only two double-blind studies in which atypical agents were compared directly have been published. Neither provides compelling evidence for the choice of one agent over another. Atypical agents are many times more expensive than conventional drugs. Although drug treatment constitutes only a small proportion of the costs of managing schizophrenia, the additional annual cost of the use of atypical agents in, say, a quarter of the likely U.K. schizophrenic population would be about 56 M pound sterling. There is only limited evidence of cost-effectiveness. Atypical antipsychotics are not currently licensed for other conditions where conventional antipsychotics are commonly used, such as behaviour disturbance or dementia in the elderly. Their dose, and place in treatment in such cases have yet to be determined.
估计有四分之一到三分之一的患者对治疗无反应;传统抗精神病药物对阴性症状(思维贫乏、社交退缩和情感缺失)的影响有限;且存在不良反应,尤其是锥体外系症状(EPS)。较新的所谓非典型抗精神病药物,如奥氮平、利培酮、舍吲哚和氯氮平(一种于1990年重新引入的旧药)据称可解决这些局限性。非典型药物至少与氟哌啶醇等传统药物一样有效。它们还能显著减少锥体外系症状。然而,一些其他不良反应比传统药物更为常见。例如,氯氮平有严重血液疾病的重大风险,对此必须进行特殊监测;它还比传统药物更常引起令人烦恼的嗜睡和流涎增加。一些非典型药物比旧药更容易导致体重增加或QT间期延长。因此,治疗方案的选择并非易事。目前,非典型药物对于有严重或无法耐受的EPS的患者来说是一种进步。大多数已发表的证据支持使用氯氮平,它也已被证明对传统药物难治的精神分裂症有效。然而,由于需要坚持进行血常规监测及其镇静作用,谨慎选择患者很重要。非典型药物对阴性症状的任何额外直接益处的程度尚不清楚。非典型药物缺乏长效剂型可能会带来重大的实际问题。迄今为止,仅发表了两项直接比较非典型药物的双盲研究。两者均未提供令人信服的证据来支持选择一种药物而非另一种药物。非典型药物比传统药物贵很多倍。尽管药物治疗仅占精神分裂症管理成本的一小部分,但比如说,在英国四分之一可能患精神分裂症的人群中使用非典型药物的额外年度成本约为5600万英镑。成本效益的证据有限。非典型抗精神病药物目前未被批准用于传统抗精神病药物常用的其他病症,如行为障碍或老年痴呆。它们在这些情况下的剂量和治疗地位尚未确定。