de C Ramos M, Soini H, Roscanni G C, Jaques M, Villares M C, Musser J M
Faculdade de Ciencias Medicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Sao Paulo State, Brazil.
J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Apr;37(4):916-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.4.916-919.1999.
A striking increase in the numbers of cultures positive for Mycobacterium tuberculosis was noticed in a mycobacterial reference laboratory in Campinas, Sao Paulo State, Brazil, in May 1995. A contaminated bronchoscope was the suspected cause of the increase. All 91 M. tuberculosis isolates grown from samples from patients between 8 May and 18 July 1995 were characterized by spoligotyping and IS6110 fingerprinting. Sixty-one of the 91 isolates had identical spoligotype patterns, and the pattern was arbitrarily designated S36. The 61 specimens containing these isolates had been processed and cultured in a 21-day period ending on 1 June 1995, but only 1 sample was smear positive for acid-fast bacilli. The patient from whom this sample was obtained was considered to be the index case patient and had a 4+ smear-positive lymph node aspirate that had been sent to the laboratory on 10 May. Virtually all organisms with spoligotype S36 had the same IS6110 fingerprint pattern. Extensive review of the patients' charts and investigation of laboratory procedures revealed that cross-contamination of specimens had occurred. Because the same strain was grown from all types of specimens, the bronchoscope was ruled out as the outbreak source. The most likely source of contamination was a multiple-use reagent used for specimen processing. The organism was cultured from two of the solutions 3 weeks after mock contamination. This investigation strongly supports the idea that M. tuberculosis grown from smear-negative specimens should be analyzed by rapid and reliable strain differentiation techniques, such as spoligotyping, to help rule out laboratory contamination.
1995年5月,巴西圣保罗州坎皮纳斯的一家分枝杆菌参考实验室注意到结核分枝杆菌培养阳性数量显著增加。怀疑污染源是一台受污染的支气管镜。对1995年5月8日至7月18日期间从患者样本中培养出的所有91株结核分枝杆菌进行了间隔寡核苷酸分型(spoligotyping)和IS6110指纹分析。91株分离株中有61株具有相同的间隔寡核苷酸分型模式,该模式被任意指定为S36。含有这些分离株的61份标本在截至1995年6月1日的21天内进行了处理和培养,但只有1份样本抗酸杆菌涂片呈阳性。获得该样本的患者被视为索引病例患者,其淋巴结穿刺液涂片4+阳性,于5月10日送检实验室。几乎所有具有间隔寡核苷酸分型S36的菌株都具有相同的IS6110指纹模式。对患者病历的广泛审查和实验室操作调查显示,标本发生了交叉污染。由于所有类型的标本都培养出了相同的菌株,因此排除支气管镜作为暴发源。最可能的污染源是用于标本处理的一种多用途试剂。模拟污染3周后,从两种溶液中培养出了该菌株。这项调查有力地支持了这样一种观点,即对于从涂片阴性标本中培养出的结核分枝杆菌,应通过快速可靠的菌株鉴别技术(如间隔寡核苷酸分型)进行分析,以帮助排除实验室污染。