Agree E M
Department of Population and Family Health Sciences, School of Hygiene and Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 1999 Feb;48(4):427-43. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00369-4.
The goal of all long-term care arrangements is to reduce the disabling effects of physical impairments and functional limitations. However, the means with which individuals cope with disability may not be equivalent and these differences may influence self-reports of disability in surveys. This paper examines assistive devices and personal care as factors in the measurement of disability among persons aged 70 and older in the community using the 1994 Survey of Asset and Health Dynamics of the Oldest Old (AHEAD) in the US. The use of assistive technology differs from personal care on a fundamental level. It does not require the ongoing cooperation or coordination of other people and therefore increases the sense of independence with which a disabled individual can meet their long-term care needs. Results indicate that older individuals can expect to spend most of their remaining years in good functional health, but up to two-thirds of disabled years will be spent with unmet ADL needs. Among those who are disabled, those who use only equipment and no personal care report less residual difficulty with mobility than those who use personal assistance (either alone or in combination with equipment) but the use of equipment alone is most effective for those with the least severe limitations.
所有长期护理安排的目标都是减轻身体损伤和功能限制所带来的致残影响。然而,个体应对残疾的方式可能并不相同,这些差异可能会影响调查中残疾的自我报告。本文利用1994年美国最年长者资产与健康动态调查(AHEAD),研究辅助设备和个人护理作为社区中70岁及以上人群残疾测量因素的情况。辅助技术的使用在根本层面上与个人护理不同。它不需要他人持续的合作或协调,因此增强了残疾个体满足其长期护理需求的独立感。结果表明,老年人预计在其剩余岁月的大部分时间里功能健康状况良好,但高达三分之二的残疾岁月将伴随着未得到满足的日常生活活动需求度过。在残疾人群中,仅使用设备而不接受个人护理的人报告的行动残留困难比使用个人协助(单独或与设备结合使用)的人少,但仅使用设备对限制最不严重的人最有效。