• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

检查辅助技术在老年种族/民族群体中的使用情况中的社会决定因素。

Examining social determinants in use of assistive technology for race/ethnic groups of older adults.

机构信息

Silberman School of Social Work, Hunter College, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.

School of Social Work, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, MI, USA.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022 Aug;17(6):703-711. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1814430. Epub 2020 Sep 10.

DOI:10.1080/17483107.2020.1814430
PMID:32907405
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7977628/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Assistive technologies (AT) can compensate for activity limitations and loss of physical functioning. Little is known regarding how minority older adults differ in AT use as they age. This study examined race and ethnic differences in AT use among a nationally representative sample of older adults in the United States.

DESIGN

Weighted logistic regression analyses were conducted using the 2012 Behavioural Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), collected annually by the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The study sample included 282,825 non-Hispanic White, African American, Asian and non-White Hispanic older adults. Activity limitation, health care access, overall health status and sociodemographic characteristics were included as variables in the analysis. Interaction analyses were conducted to examine the moderating effect of race/ethnicity on social determinants with AT use.

RESULTS

Results indicated that 13.5% of older adults reported the use of an AT. African American older adults had the highest percentage of AT use (21.0%), and Asian older adults had the lowest (5.1%). Those who were 85years and older, reported an activity limitation, were unmarried and in poor health were most likely to use an AT. Having health insurance was significantly associated with higher AT use for non-Hispanic Whites ( = 1.66, <0.001) and non-White Hispanics ( = 1.98, <0.01), but not African Americans and Asians.

CONCLUSION

Health professionals can promote access and address barriers in AT use, particularly in regard to accessibility and acceptability among minority older adults.Implications for rehabilitationAfrican-Americans older adults were most likely to use ATs, and Asian older adults the leastOlder adults who were 85 years and older, reported an activity limitation, were unmarried and in poor health were most likely to use an ATDifferent social determinants to AT use were found among race/ethnic groups, highlighting the need to promote access and address barriers to health care utilization.

摘要

目的

辅助技术(AT)可以弥补活动受限和身体功能丧失。对于少数族裔老年人随着年龄增长在 AT 使用方面的差异知之甚少。本研究通过美国全国代表性老年人样本,调查了种族和民族在 AT 使用方面的差异。

设计

使用疾病预防控制中心(CDC)每年收集的 2012 年行为风险因素监测系统(BRFSS)进行加权逻辑回归分析。研究样本包括 282825 名非西班牙裔白种人、非裔美国人、亚裔和非白西班牙裔老年人。活动受限、获得医疗保健的机会、总体健康状况和社会人口学特征被纳入分析变量。进行交互分析以检验种族/民族对 AT 使用的社会决定因素的调节作用。

结果

结果表明,13.5%的老年人报告使用了 AT。非裔美国人老年人使用 AT 的比例最高(21.0%),而亚裔老年人的比例最低(5.1%)。85 岁及以上、报告活动受限、未婚和健康状况不佳的老年人最有可能使用 AT。有医疗保险与非西班牙裔白人( = 1.66,<0.001)和非白西班牙裔( = 1.98,<0.01)的 AT 使用显著相关,但与非裔美国人和亚裔无关。

结论

卫生专业人员可以促进 AT 的获取并解决使用障碍,特别是在少数族裔老年人中提高可及性和可接受性。

康复意义

非裔美国老年人最有可能使用 AT,而亚裔老年人则最少。85 岁及以上、报告活动受限、未婚和健康状况不佳的老年人最有可能使用 AT。在不同种族/民族群体中发现了 AT 使用的不同社会决定因素,这突显了促进获取和解决医疗保健利用障碍的必要性。

相似文献

1
Examining social determinants in use of assistive technology for race/ethnic groups of older adults.检查辅助技术在老年种族/民族群体中的使用情况中的社会决定因素。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022 Aug;17(6):703-711. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1814430. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
2
State-specific prevalence of selected health behaviors, by race and ethnicity--Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1997.按种族和族裔划分的特定州选定健康行为的患病率——行为风险因素监测系统,1997年
MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 2000 Mar 24;49(2):1-60.
3
The role of race and ethnicity in the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) in four states: are there baseline disparities, and what do they mean for SCHIP?种族和族裔在四个州的儿童健康保险计划(SCHIP)中的作用:是否存在基线差异,以及这些差异对儿童健康保险计划意味着什么?
Pediatrics. 2003 Dec;112(6 Pt 2):e521.
4
Core state preconception health indicators - pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system and behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 2009.核心孕前健康指标 - 妊娠风险评估监测系统和行为危险因素监测系统,2009 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014 Apr 25;63(3):1-62.
5
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Diabetes Screening Between Asian Americans and Other Adults: BRFSS 2012-2014.2012 - 2014年美国行为危险因素监测系统(BRFSS):亚裔美国人和其他成年人在糖尿病筛查方面的种族和族裔差异
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Apr;32(4):423-429. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3913-x. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
6
Racial and ethnic differences in perception of provider cultural competence among patients with depression and anxiety symptoms: a retrospective, population-based, cross-sectional analysis.抑郁和焦虑症状患者感知提供者文化能力的种族和民族差异:一项回顾性、基于人群、横断面分析。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Nov;8(11):957-968. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00285-6. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
7
Racial and Ethnic Digital Divides in Posting COVID-19 Content on Social Media Among US Adults: Secondary Survey Analysis.美国成年人在社交媒体上发布新冠疫情相关内容时的种族和族裔数字鸿沟:二次调查分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 3;22(7):e20472. doi: 10.2196/20472.
8
Surveillance of health status in minority communities - Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health Across the U.S. (REACH U.S.) Risk Factor Survey, United States, 2009.少数民族社区健康状况监测 - 美国全民族族裔社区健康方法(REACH US)风险因素调查,2009 年美国。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2011 May 20;60(6):1-44.
9
Racial-ethnic disparities in stroke care: the American experience: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.种族和民族差异在卒中护理中的表现:美国经验:美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会向医疗保健专业人员的声明。
Stroke. 2011 Jul;42(7):2091-116. doi: 10.1161/STR.0b013e3182213e24. Epub 2011 May 26.
10
Racial and Ethnic Difference in Falls Among Older Adults: Results from the California Health Interview Survey.老年人跌倒的种族和民族差异:来自加利福尼亚健康访谈调查的结果。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2018 Apr;5(2):271-278. doi: 10.1007/s40615-017-0367-8. Epub 2017 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Access to eye care and support services among adults from minority ethnic communities living with visual impairment in the United Kingdom.在英国,视力受损的少数族裔成年人获得眼科保健和支持服务的情况。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 8;11:1277519. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1277519. eCollection 2023.
2
Multilevel barriers to using assistive technology devices among older hispanics from poor and disadvantaged communities: the relevance of a gender analysis.多层面障碍导致贫困和弱势社区的老年西班牙裔人群无法使用辅助技术设备:性别分析的相关性。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024 Apr;19(3):682-698. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2022.2117427. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
3
Activity limitation and participation restriction in Osteoarthritis and Rheumatoid arthritis: findings based on the National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey.骨关节炎和类风湿关节炎中的活动受限和参与受限:基于全国健康和营养检查调查的结果。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jul 6;23(1):647. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05607-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Variation in the Presence of Simple Home Modifications of Older Americans: Findings from the National Health and Aging Trends Study.老年人家庭简单改造情况的变化:来自国家健康老龄化趋势研究的发现。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Oct;64(10):2081-2087. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14252. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
2
Disability Rises Gradually for a Cohort of Older Americans.一群美国老年人的残疾率逐渐上升。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2017 Jan;72(1):151-161. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbw002. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
3
The Effect of Information Communication Technology Interventions on Reducing Social Isolation in the Elderly: A Systematic Review.信息通信技术干预对减少老年人社会隔离的影响:一项系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jan 28;18(1):e18. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4596.
4
Assistive technologies in reducing caregiver burden among informal caregivers of older adults: a systematic review.辅助技术减轻老年人非正式照料者的照料负担:一项系统综述
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(5):353-60. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2015.1087061. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
5
Investigating the effectiveness of technologies applied to assist seniors: A systematic literature review.调查应用于帮助老年人的技术的有效性:一项系统的文献综述。
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Jan;85(1):17-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.05.014. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
6
Mobility device use in older adults and incidence of falls and worry about falling: findings from the 2011-2012 national health and aging trends study.老年人使用移动设备与跌倒发生率及跌倒担忧:2011 - 2012年国家健康与老龄化趋势研究的结果
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 May;63(5):853-9. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13393. Epub 2015 May 6.
7
Racial/Ethnic predictors of falls among older adults: the health and retirement study.老年人跌倒的种族/民族预测因素:健康与退休研究。
J Aging Health. 2014 Sep;26(6):1060-75. doi: 10.1177/0898264314541698. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
8
Utilization of assistive technology by persons with physical disabilities: an examination of predictive factors by race.身体残疾者对辅助技术的使用:按种族对预测因素的考察。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014 Nov;9(6):487-92. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2013.836683. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
9
Innovative assistive technology in Finnish public elderly-care services: a focus on productivity.芬兰公共老年护理服务中的创新辅助技术:以生产力为重点。
Work. 2013 Jan 1;46(1):77-91. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-1470.
10
Effects of assistive technology on functional decline in people aging with a disability.辅助技术对残疾老年人功能下降的影响。
Assist Technol. 2009 Winter;21(4):208-17. doi: 10.1080/10400430903246068.