• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1996 - 1998年俄勒冈州实施全面烟草预防和教育项目后香烟消费量的下降

Decline in cigarette consumption following implementation of a comprehensive tobacco prevention and education program--Oregon, 1996-1998.

出版信息

MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1999 Feb 26;48(7):140-3.

PMID:10077459
Abstract

In November 1996, residents of Oregon approved a ballot measure increasing the cigarette tax by 30 cents (to 68 cents per pack). The measure stipulated that 10% of the additional tax revenue be allocated to the Oregon Health Division (OHD) to develop and implement a tobacco-use prevention program. In 1997, OHD created Oregon's Tobacco Prevention and Education Program (TPEP), a comprehensive, community-based program modeled on the successful tobacco-use prevention programs in California and Massachusetts. To assess the effects of the tax increase and TPEP in Oregon, OHD evaluated data on the number of packs of cigarettes taxed before (1993-1996) and after (1997-1998) the ballot initiative and implementation of the program. Oregon's results also were compared with national data. This report summarizes the results of the analysis, which indicate that consumption of cigarettes in Oregon declined substantially after implementation of the excise tax and TPEP and exceeded the national rate of decline.

摘要

1996年11月,俄勒冈州居民通过了一项投票措施,将香烟税提高了30美分(至每包68美分)。该措施规定,额外税收收入的10%将分配给俄勒冈州卫生部门(OHD),用于制定和实施一项烟草使用预防计划。1997年,OHD创建了俄勒冈州烟草预防与教育计划(TPEP),这是一个基于社区的综合计划,仿照加利福尼亚州和马萨诸塞州成功的烟草使用预防计划制定。为了评估俄勒冈州增税和TPEP的效果,OHD评估了投票倡议和该计划实施之前(1993 - 1996年)和之后(1997 - 1998年)征税的香烟包数数据。俄勒冈州的结果也与全国数据进行了比较。本报告总结了分析结果,结果表明,在实施消费税和TPEP后,俄勒冈州的香烟消费量大幅下降,且超过了全国下降率。

相似文献

1
Decline in cigarette consumption following implementation of a comprehensive tobacco prevention and education program--Oregon, 1996-1998.1996 - 1998年俄勒冈州实施全面烟草预防和教育项目后香烟消费量的下降
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1999 Feb 26;48(7):140-3.
2
Cigarette smoking before and after an excise tax increase and an antismoking campaign--Massachusetts, 1990-1996.消费税上调与反吸烟运动前后的吸烟情况——马萨诸塞州,1990 - 1996年
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1996 Nov 8;45(44):966-70.
3
Effectiveness of school-based programs as a component of a statewide tobacco control initiative--Oregon, 1999-2000.作为全州烟草控制倡议的一部分的校内项目的成效——俄勒冈州,1999 - 2000年
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001 Aug 10;50(31):663-6.
4
Tobacco tax initiative--Oregon, 1996.烟草税倡议——俄勒冈州,1996年
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1997 Mar 21;46(11):246-8.
5
From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Decline in cigarette consumption following implementation of a comprehensive tobacco prevention and education program--Oregon, 1996-1998.来自疾病控制与预防中心。1996 - 1998年俄勒冈州实施全面烟草预防与教育项目后卷烟消费量的下降情况。
JAMA. 1999 Apr 28;281(16):1483-4.
6
Independent evaluation of the California Tobacco Education Program.加利福尼亚烟草教育项目的独立评估。
Public Health Rep. 1996 Jul-Aug;111(4):353-8.
7
State cigarette excise taxes - United States, 2009.州香烟消费税-美国,2009 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010 Apr 9;59(13):385-8.
8
A simulation model to predict the fiscal and public health impact of a change in cigarette excise taxes.一种用于预测香烟消费税变化对财政和公共卫生影响的仿真模型。
Tob Control. 2010 Feb;19(1):31-6. doi: 10.1136/tc.2008.028779. Epub 2009 Oct 21.
9
Increasing excise taxes on cigarettes in California: a dynamic simulation of health and economic impacts.提高加利福尼亚州香烟消费税:对健康和经济影响的动态模拟
Prev Med. 2005 Jul;41(1):276-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.10.024. Epub 2005 Jan 7.
10
The effect of cigarette price increase on the cigarette consumption in Taiwan: evidence from the National Health Interview Surveys on cigarette consumption.香烟价格上涨对台湾地区香烟消费的影响:基于全国香烟消费健康访谈调查的证据
BMC Public Health. 2004 Dec 14;4:61. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-4-61.

引用本文的文献

1
State tobacco control expenditures and tax paid cigarette sales.国家烟草控制支出和已纳税香烟销售额。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 13;13(4):e0194914. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194914. eCollection 2018.
2
Mass media interventions for smoking cessation in adults.针对成年人戒烟的大众媒体干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 21;11(11):CD004704. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004704.pub4.
3
Program, policy, and price interventions for tobacco control: quantifying the return on investment of a state tobacco control program.
计划、政策和价格干预措施在烟草控制中的作用:量化州级烟草控制计划的投资回报。
Am J Public Health. 2012 Feb;102(2):e22-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300506. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
4
Changes in smoking prevalence among U.S. adults by state and region: Estimates from the Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey, 1992-2007.美国各州和地区成年人吸烟率的变化:1992-2007 年美国当前人口调查的烟草使用补充调查估计数。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Jun 29;11:512. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-512.
5
Over-the-counter nicotine replacement therapy: can its impact on smoking cessation be enhanced?非处方尼古丁替代疗法:其对戒烟的影响能否得到增强?
Psychol Addict Behav. 2008 Dec;22(4):472-85. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.22.4.472.
6
State tobacco control spending and youth smoking.国家烟草控制支出与青少年吸烟情况
Am J Public Health. 2005 Feb;95(2):338-44. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.039727.
7
Interorganizational relationships within state tobacco control networks: a social network analysis.州级烟草控制网络中的组织间关系:一项社会网络分析
Prev Chronic Dis. 2004 Oct;1(4):A08. Epub 2004 Sep 15.
8
Independent evaluation of the California Tobacco Control Program: relationships between program exposure and outcomes, 1996-1998.加利福尼亚烟草控制项目的独立评估:1996 - 1998年项目接触与成果之间的关系
Am J Public Health. 2002 Jun;92(6):975-83. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.6.975.