Cheam E W, Critchley L A, Chui P T, Yap J C, Ha V W
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, N.T., PRC.
Can J Anaesth. 1999 Jan;46(1):49-51. doi: 10.1007/BF03012514.
To compare the efficacy of low dose (LD) mivacurium (0.08 mg.kg-1) with LD succinylcholine (0.5 mg.kg-1) in modifying seizure activity during electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Partial muscle relaxation is used in ECT to prevent violent muscle contractions. Current practice is to use LD succinylcholine which has several undesirable side effects.
Sixteen depressed, but otherwise healthy, patients, aged 27-67 yr were studied. In a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study, either LD mivacurium or LD succinylcholine was given at consecutive ECTs 120 and 30 sec respectively before inducing ECT. Neuromuscular blockade following mivacurium was not reversed. Seizure modification was scored--0 = no seizure activity, 1 = over-modified, 2 = desired level, 3 = under-modified, 4 = unmodified. Duration of seizures, time to first breath and adequate ventilation, ability to protrude tongue and sustain hand grip for five seconds were recorded. Paired t-tests and Wilcoxon matched pairs test were used to compare data. P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Seizure modification was better (mean (range)) after succinylcholine 2.06(1-3) than after mivacurium 2.56(2-4) (P < 0.05). Mivacurium was unsatisfactory in eight cases compared with two cases after succinylcholine. The study was terminated early because of unsatisfactory seizure control. Clinical assessments of recovery from both relaxants were similar.
Low dose mivacurium is unsuitable for use in ECT.
比较低剂量(LD)米库氯铵(0.08mg·kg-1)与低剂量琥珀酰胆碱(0.5mg·kg-1)在电惊厥治疗(ECT)期间改变癫痫发作活动的疗效。ECT中使用部分肌肉松弛来防止剧烈的肌肉收缩。目前的做法是使用低剂量琥珀酰胆碱,但其有几种不良副作用。
研究了年龄在27至67岁之间的16名抑郁症患者,他们在其他方面均健康。在一项随机、双盲、交叉研究中,分别在诱导ECT前120秒和30秒的连续ECT中给予低剂量米库氯铵或低剂量琥珀酰胆碱。米库氯铵后的神经肌肉阻滞未被逆转。对癫痫发作改变进行评分——0 = 无癫痫发作活动,1 = 过度改变,2 = 期望水平,3 = 改变不足,4 = 未改变。记录癫痫发作持续时间、首次呼吸和充分通气时间、伸舌能力以及持续握力5秒的能力。采用配对t检验和Wilcoxon配对检验比较数据。P < 0.05被认为具有显著性。
琥珀酰胆碱后的癫痫发作改变情况更好(均值(范围)),为2.06(1 - 3),而米库氯铵后为2.56(2 - 4)(P < 0.05)。米库氯铵有8例效果不佳,而琥珀酰胆碱后为2例。由于癫痫发作控制不佳,该研究提前终止。两种松弛剂恢复情况的临床评估相似。
低剂量米库氯铵不适用于ECT。