Wilde J A, McMillan J A, Serwint J, Butta J, O'Riordan M A, Steinhoff M C
Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Rainbow Babies and Childrens Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
JAMA. 1999 Mar 10;281(10):908-13. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.10.908.
Data are limited and conflicting regarding the effectiveness of influenza vaccine in health care professionals.
To determine the effectiveness of trivalent influenza vaccine in reducing infection, illness, and absence from work in young, healthy health care professionals.
Randomized, prospective, double-blind, controlled trial over 3 consecutive years, from 1992-1993 to 1994-1995.
Two large teaching hospitals in Baltimore, Md.
Two hundred sixty-four hospital-based health care professionals without chronic medical problems were recruited; 49 participated for 2 seasons; 24 participated for 3 seasons. The mean age was 28.4 years, 75% were resident physicians, and 57% were women.
Participants were randomly assigned to receive either an influenza vaccine or a control (meningococcal vaccine, pneumococcal vaccine, or placebo). Serum samples for antibody assays were collected at the time of vaccination, 1 month after vaccination, and at the end of the influenza season. Active weekly surveillance for illness was conducted during each influenza epidemic period.
Serologically defined influenza infection (4-fold increase in hemagglutination-inhibiting antibodies), days of febrile respiratory illness, and days absent from work.
We conducted 359 person-winters of serologic surveillance (99.4% follow-up) and 4746 person-weeks of illness surveillance (100% follow-up). Twenty-four(13.4%) of 179 control subjects and 3 (1.7%) of 180 influenza vaccine recipients had serologic evidence of influenza type A or B infection during the study period. Vaccine efficacy against serologically defined infection was 88% for influenza A (95% confidence interval [CI], 47%-97%; P=.001) and 89% for influenza B (95% CI, 14%-99%; P=.03). Among influenza vaccinees, cumulative days of reported febrile respiratory illness were 28.7 per 100 subjects compared with 40.6 per 100 subjects in controls (P=.57) and days of absence were 9.9 per 100 subjects vs 21.1 per 100 subjects in controls (P=.41).
Influenza vaccine is effective in preventing infection by influenza A and B in health care professionals and may reduce reported days of work absence and febrile respiratory illness. These data support a policy of annual influenza vaccination of health care professionals.
关于流感疫苗对医护人员的有效性,数据有限且相互矛盾。
确定三价流感疫苗在减少年轻、健康医护人员感染、发病及缺勤方面的有效性。
1992 - 1993年至1994 - 1995年连续3年的随机、前瞻性、双盲、对照试验。
马里兰州巴尔的摩的两家大型教学医院。
招募了264名无慢性疾病的医院医护人员;49人参与了2个季节;24人参与了3个季节。平均年龄为28.4岁,75%为住院医师,57%为女性。
参与者被随机分配接受流感疫苗或对照(脑膜炎球菌疫苗、肺炎球菌疫苗或安慰剂)。在接种疫苗时、接种后1个月以及流感季节结束时采集血清样本进行抗体检测。在每个流感流行期间每周进行主动疾病监测。
血清学定义的流感感染(血凝抑制抗体增加4倍)、发热性呼吸道疾病天数和缺勤天数。
我们进行了359人年的血清学监测(随访率99.4%)和4746人周的疾病监测(随访率100%)。在研究期间,179名对照受试者中有24人(13.4%),180名流感疫苗接种者中有3人(1.7%)有甲型或乙型流感感染的血清学证据。疫苗对血清学定义感染的效力,甲型流感为88%(95%置信区间[CI],47% - 97%;P = 0.001),乙型流感为89%(95% CI,14% - 99%;P = 0.03)。在流感疫苗接种者中,每100名受试者报告的发热性呼吸道疾病累计天数为28.7天,而对照组为每100名受试者40.6天(P = 0.57),缺勤天数为每100名受试者9.9天对对照组的每100名受试者21.1天(P = 0.41)。
流感疫苗对预防医护人员的甲型和乙型流感感染有效,并可能减少报告的缺勤天数和发热性呼吸道疾病天数。这些数据支持医护人员每年接种流感疫苗的政策。