Atkin P A, Veitch P C, Veitch E M, Ogle S J
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards, NSW, Australia.
Drugs Aging. 1999 Feb;14(2):141-52. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199914020-00005.
Although the incidence and prevalence of serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in the elderly cannot be accurately stated, published estimates appear to be unchanged since the earliest reports in the 1960s. Whereas heightened awareness of the problem may weigh in favour of a reduction in ADR frequency, the dramatic increase in the number and availability of therapeutic agents has undoubtedly contributed to the observed high proportion of drug-induced morbidity among acute geriatric hospital admissions. No single drug or drug class is of particular concern since none appears to cause serious morbidity out of proportion with its use. Although numerous studies have sought to identify risk factors for ADRs, the only truly independent predictor is the absolute number of concurrently used medications. However, other studies indicate that there is poor doctor-patient agreement regarding a patient's drug regimen, and interventions that aim to reduce the incidence of ADRs have failed to demonstrate a positive effect. Thus at present the most rational approach would appear to be to establish an accurate knowledge of the patients drug regimens: once this is known one can attempt to rationally minimise the number of medications without compromising therapeutic goals.
虽然无法准确说明老年人严重药物不良反应(ADR)的发生率和患病率,但自20世纪60年代最早的报告以来,已发表的估计数似乎没有变化。尽管对该问题的认识提高可能有利于降低ADR的发生率,但治疗药物数量和可获得性的急剧增加无疑导致了在急性老年住院患者中观察到的药物诱发疾病的高比例。没有单一药物或药物类别特别令人担忧,因为似乎没有一种药物会因其使用而导致与其不成比例的严重发病率。尽管众多研究试图确定ADR的风险因素,但唯一真正独立的预测因素是同时使用药物的绝对数量。然而,其他研究表明,医患在患者用药方案方面的一致性较差,旨在降低ADR发生率的干预措施未能显示出积极效果。因此,目前最合理的方法似乎是准确了解患者的用药方案:一旦了解了这一点,就可以尝试在不影响治疗目标的情况下合理减少用药数量。