Reinecke M A, Beebe D W, Stein M A
Department of Psychiatry, University of Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1999 Mar;38(3):322-8. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199903000-00020.
This study examined the ecological validity, construct validity, and diagnostic utility of the third factor of the WISC-III, heuristically labeled "Freedom From Distractibility" (FFD).
A sample of 200 children, aged 6 to 11 years, with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) completed the WISC-III, the Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised, and the Test of Variables of Attention. Objective parent and teacher report measures of attention and hyperactivity were completed.
Mean FFD scores were significantly lower than other WISC-III factor scores. The diagnostic utility of FFD is limited, however, as the majority of these children did not show a significant relative weakness on this index. Correlational analyses failed to support the concurrent, ecological, or construct validity of the FFD. FFD scores were not correlated with a measure of sustained visual attention. Findings suggest that among children with ADHD, a low FFD score may be associated with the presence of a learning disability or poor academic performance. This finding was maintained after level of general intelligence was statistically controlled.
Clinicians and researchers should not view FFD as a reliable or valid index of attention or as a diagnostic screening measure for identifying children with ADHD.
本研究考察了韦氏儿童智力量表第三版(WISC - III)中经启发式标注为“不受干扰能力”(FFD)的第三个因素的生态效度、结构效度和诊断效用。
200名年龄在6至11岁的患有注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的儿童完成了WISC - III、修订版广泛成就测验以及注意力变量测试。完成了客观的家长和教师关于注意力和多动情况的报告测量。
FFD平均得分显著低于WISC - III的其他因素得分。然而,FFD的诊断效用有限,因为这些儿童中的大多数在该指标上并未表现出显著的相对劣势。相关分析未能支持FFD的同时效度、生态效度或结构效度。FFD得分与持续性视觉注意力测量不相关。研究结果表明,在患有ADHD的儿童中,低FFD得分可能与学习障碍或学业成绩差有关。在对一般智力水平进行统计控制后,这一发现依然成立。
临床医生和研究人员不应将FFD视为注意力的可靠或有效指标,也不应将其作为识别患有ADHD儿童的诊断筛查手段。