Suppr超能文献

心房颤动患者的房室结消融与起搏器植入

Atrioventricular nodal ablation and pacemaker implantation in patients with atrial fibrillation.

作者信息

Touboul P

机构信息

Hôpital Cardiologique, Lyons, France.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1999 Mar 11;83(5B):241D-245D. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)01036-4.

Abstract

In drug-resistant, poorly tolerated atrial fibrillation, atrioventricular (AV) junction catheter ablation can be proposed as the last-resort option. Technically, the procedure is easy to perform and relatively safe. Interruption of the AV conduction implies the insertion of a permanent pacemaker. In patients with chronic atrial fibrillation, a VVIR pacemaker is inserted. For those having severely symptomatic episodes of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, DDDR mode-switching devices are more appropriate. Results are remarkable. The treatment is highly effective in controlling symptoms and improving general well-being. Exercise capacity is also increased. Left ventricular ejection fraction may increase after ablation, an effect that is mainly apparent in patients with markedly depressed myocardial function. Consumption of healthcare resources has been shown to decrease significantly in the aftermath of AV junction ablation. However, sudden-death risk has been invoked as a limiting factor for the procedure. This may be due to AV-block-related ventricular tachyarrhythmias, occurring early after ablation, whereas the reasons for late sudden deaths are somewhat more obscure. It is unclear whether such events are procedure-related or rather secondary to the underlying heart disease. Thus, AV junction ablation for refractory atrial fibrillation remains the only nonpharmacologic, alternative therapy that is performed on a routine basis. Failure of newer therapeutic approaches should further reinforce the clinical impact of this procedure in the future.

摘要

在耐药性、耐受性差的心房颤动中,房室(AV)结导管消融可作为最后的选择。从技术上讲,该手术易于实施且相对安全。房室传导的中断意味着需要植入永久性起搏器。对于慢性心房颤动患者,植入VVIR起搏器。对于那些有严重症状性阵发性心房颤动发作的患者,DDDR模式转换装置更为合适。结果显著。该治疗在控制症状和改善总体健康状况方面非常有效。运动能力也会提高。消融后左心室射血分数可能会增加,这种效应主要在心肌功能明显受损的患者中较为明显。已证明房室结消融后医疗资源的消耗会显著减少。然而,猝死风险被认为是该手术的一个限制因素。这可能是由于消融后早期发生的与房室传导阻滞相关的室性快速心律失常,而晚期猝死的原因则较为模糊。尚不清楚此类事件是与手术相关还是继发于潜在的心脏病。因此,房室结消融治疗难治性心房颤动仍然是唯一常规进行的非药物替代疗法。新治疗方法的失败应在未来进一步加强该手术的临床影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验