Bounds W, Grubb C, Metaxas N, Vessey M
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1976 Dec;83(12):981-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1976.tb00785.x.
The Ayre and the Armovical cervical spatulae were compared in a randomized trial involving 982 women of childbearing age. It was found that the Armovical spatula was slightly less effective than the Ayre spatula in obtaining adequate numbers of squamous cells. The Armovical spatula was, however, far better at providing a sample of endocervical or metaplastic cells and, as a result, yielded a substantially higher proportion of 'satisfactory' smears (54 per cent as against 39 per cent). Red blood cells were more often present in smears taken with the Armovical spatula than with the Ayre spatula. Although the data in the present study were too few to prove that the Armovical spatula is better than the Ayre spatula at detecting cellular abnormalities, it seems likely that this is so.
在一项涉及982名育龄妇女的随机试验中,对艾尔(Ayre)宫颈刮板和阿莫维卡尔(Armovical)宫颈刮板进行了比较。结果发现,在获取足够数量的鳞状细胞方面,阿莫维卡尔刮板的效果略逊于艾尔刮板。然而,阿莫维卡尔刮板在获取宫颈管内膜或化生细胞样本方面表现要好得多,因此,产生“满意”涂片的比例要高得多(分别为54%和39%)。与艾尔刮板相比,用阿莫维卡尔刮板采集的涂片更常出现红细胞。尽管本研究中的数据太少,无法证明阿莫维卡尔刮板在检测细胞异常方面优于艾尔刮板,但似乎很有可能如此。