艾尔诉艾尔斯伯里宫颈刮片案。
Ayre v Aylesbury cervical spatulas.
作者信息
Goorney B P, Lacey C J, Sutton J
机构信息
Department of Genitourinary Medicine, General Infirmary, Leeds.
出版信息
Genitourin Med. 1989 Jun;65(3):161-2. doi: 10.1136/sti.65.3.161.
A single blind crossover study compared the traditional Ayre spatula with the new Aylesbury spatula. The study group consisted of all women attending the department of genitourinary medicine during a 16 month period. The same incidence (3.6%) of dyskaryotic smears was found using the Ayre spatula (74/2077) as the Aylesbury spatula (72/2003). The incidence of smears with endocervical cells, however, was significantly greater using the Aylesbury (33.4%) than the Ayre (20.4%) spatulas, despite there being no difference in the incidence of smears with epithelial abnormalities. Quantitative studies thus showed that the Aylesbury gave no more accurate results than the Ayre spatula.
一项单盲交叉研究对传统的艾尔刮板与新型艾尔斯伯里刮板进行了比较。研究组由在16个月期间到泌尿生殖医学科就诊的所有女性组成。使用艾尔刮板（74/2077）和艾尔斯伯里刮板（72/2003）发现的核异质涂片发生率相同（3.6%）。然而，尽管上皮异常涂片的发生率没有差异，但使用艾尔斯伯里刮板（33.4%）时宫颈管细胞涂片的发生率明显高于艾尔刮板（20.4%）。定量研究因此表明，艾尔斯伯里刮板的结果并不比艾尔刮板更准确。
Zotero 插件