Sexuality and health: the hidden costs of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis.
作者信息
Duncan B, Hart G
机构信息
MRC Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8RZ.
出版信息
BMJ. 1999 Apr 3;318(7188):931-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7188.931.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Sexuality and health: the hidden costs of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis.性与健康：沙眼衣原体筛查的隐性成本
BMJ. 1999 Apr 3;318(7188):931-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7188.931.
2
Comparing cost effectiveness of screening women for Chlamydia trachomatis in systematic and opportunistic approaches.比较以系统方法和机会性方法对女性进行沙眼衣原体筛查的成本效益。
Sex Transm Infect. 2002 Feb;78(1):73-4. doi: 10.1136/sti.78.1.73.
3
Cost effectiveness analysis of a population based screening programme for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women.基于人群的女性无症状沙眼衣原体感染筛查项目的成本效益分析。
Sex Transm Infect. 2002 Feb;78(1):76. doi: 10.1136/sti.78.1.76-a.
4
[Towards screening for Chlamydia trachomatis].[关于沙眼衣原体的筛查]
Ugeskr Laeger. 1997 Aug 18;159(34):5104-5.
5
Major improvements in cost effectiveness of screening women for Chlamydia trachomatis using pooled urine specimens and high performance testing.使用混合尿液标本和高性能检测方法对女性进行沙眼衣原体筛查的成本效益有了重大提高。
Sex Transm Infect. 2002 Feb;78(1):74-5. doi: 10.1136/sti.78.1.74.
6
7
An evaluation of economics and acceptability of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection, in women attending antenatal, abortion, colposcopy and family planning clinics in Scotland, UK.对英国苏格兰产前、堕胎、阴道镜检查及计划生育诊所就诊女性进行沙眼衣原体感染筛查的经济学评估及可接受性评估。
BJOG. 2004 Nov;111(11):1261-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00324.x.
8
[Screening for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infection: cost-effectiveness favorable at a minimum prevalence rate of 3% or more].[无症状沙眼衣原体感染的筛查：在最低患病率为3%或更高时成本效益良好]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2001 Mar 10;145(10):499-501.
9
Is screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection cost effective?
Genitourin Med. 1997 Apr;73(2):103-4. doi: 10.1136/sti.73.2.103.
10
[Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis among the sexually active population in Amsterdam. III. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening women and the role of reinfection and partner treatment].[阿姆斯特丹性活跃人群中沙眼衣原体生殖器感染的机会性筛查。三、筛查女性的成本效益分析以及再感染和性伴治疗的作用]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1999 Nov 20;143(47):2383-5.
引用本文的文献
1
Association of Chlamydia trachomatis infections with preterm delivery; a systematic review and meta-analysis.沙眼衣原体感染与早产的关系：系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jun 18;18(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1868-0.
2
What influences university students to seek sexually transmitted infection testing?: A qualitative study in New Zealand.是什么影响大学生寻求性传播感染检测？：新西兰的一项定性研究。
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2018 Jun;16:56-60. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2018.01.004. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
3
A PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis on Chlamydia trachomatis infections in Iranian women (1986-2015).一项关于伊朗女性沙眼衣原体感染的PRISMA系统评价和荟萃分析（1986 - 2015年）
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Apr;97(16):e0335. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010335.
4
Use of a Guinea pig-specific transcriptome array for evaluation of protective immunity against genital chlamydial infection following intranasal vaccination in Guinea pigs.使用豚鼠特异性转录组芯片评估豚鼠鼻内接种疫苗后对生殖道衣原体感染的保护性免疫。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 11;9(12):e114261. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114261. eCollection 2014.
5
The views of general practitioners and practice nurses towards the barriers and facilitators of proactive, internet-based chlamydia screening for reaching young heterosexual men.全科医生和执业护士对基于互联网的主动衣原体筛查在覆盖年轻异性恋男性方面的障碍和促进因素的看法。
BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Jun 27;15:127. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-127.
6
Chlamydia screening in England: a qualitative study of the narrative behind the policy.英国的衣原体筛查：政策背后的叙事定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Apr 30;12:317. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-317.
7
Knowledge of Chlamydia trachomatis among men and women approached to participate in community-based screening, Scotland, UK.英国苏格兰基于社区的筛查中男性和女性对沙眼衣原体的认知。
BMC Public Health. 2010 Dec 30;10:794. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-794.
8
Opportunistic screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in men attending three different secondary healthcare settings.在三种不同二级医疗保健机构就诊的男性中对沙眼衣原体进行机会性筛查。
Sex Transm Infect. 2007 Jul;83(4):282-5. doi: 10.1136/sti.2006.020149. Epub 2007 Feb 21.
9
Psychosocial impact of Chlamydia trachomatis testing in general practice.沙眼衣原体检测在全科医疗中的社会心理影响。
Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Aug;56(529):587-93.
10
Opportunistic and systematic screening for chlamydia: a study of consultations by young adults in general practice.衣原体的机会性和系统性筛查：一项关于年轻人在全科医疗中就诊情况的研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Feb;56(523):99-103.
本文引用的文献
1
Women's perceptions of female contraceptive behavior: experimental evidence of the sexual double standard.女性对自身避孕行为的认知：性双重标准的实验证据
Psychol Women Q. 1995;19(4):563-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1995.tb00093.x.
2
The establishment of mass mammographic screening programs: in whose interests?大规模乳腺钼靶筛查项目的设立：符合谁的利益？
Aust J Soc Issues. 1992 May;27(2):112-24. doi: 10.1002/j.1839-4655.1992.tb01281.x.
3
Britain launches pilot screening programme for chlamydia.英国启动衣原体筛查试点项目。
BMJ. 1998 May 16;316(7143):1479. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7143.1477e.
4
Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis. The case for screening is made, but much detail remains to be worked out.沙眼衣原体筛查。开展筛查的理由已阐明，但仍有许多细节有待完善。
BMJ. 1998 May 16;316(7143):1474. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7143.1474.
5
6
Prevention of pelvic inflammatory disease by screening for cervical chlamydial infection.通过筛查宫颈衣原体感染预防盆腔炎性疾病
N Engl J Med. 1996 May 23;334(21):1362-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199605233342103.
7
No right to silence.
Health Visit. 1993 Mar;66(3):102.
8
Feminist issues in teenage parenting.青少年育儿中的女权主义问题。
Child Welfare. 1985 May-Jun;64(3):225-34.
9
Psychosexual trauma of an abnormal cervical smear.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988 Feb;95(2):175-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1988.tb06848.x.
10
Genital chlamydial infections: epidemiology and reproductive sequelae.生殖系统衣原体感染：流行病学与生殖后遗症
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Jun;164(6 Pt 2):1771-81. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(91)90559-a.
Zotero 插件