• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国的衣原体筛查:政策背后的叙事定性研究。

Chlamydia screening in England: a qualitative study of the narrative behind the policy.

机构信息

UCL Department of Applied Health Research, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, UCL, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2012 Apr 30;12:317. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-317.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-12-317
PMID:22545922
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3458993/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The rationale for the English National Chlamydia Screening Programme (NCSP) has been questioned. There has been little analysis, however, of what drove the NCSP's establishment and how it was implemented. Such analysis will help inform the future development of the NCSP. This study used a qualitative, theory-driven approach to evaluate the rationale for the NCSP's establishment and implementation.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews with 14 experts in chlamydia screening were undertaken. The interview data were analysed with policy documents and commentaries from peer-reviewed journals (published 1996-2010) using the Framework approach.

RESULTS

Two themes drove the NCSP's establishment and implementation. The first, chlamydia control, was prominently referenced in documents and interviews. The second theme concerned the potential for chlamydia screening to advance wider improvements in sexual health. In particular, screening was expected to promote sexual health services in primary care and encourage discussion of sexual health with young people. While this theme was only indirectly referenced in policy documents, it was cited by interviewees as a strong influence on implementation in the early years. However, by full rollout of the Programme, a focus on screening volume may have limited the NCSP's capacity to improve broader aspects of sexual health.

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of explicit and implicit drivers underpinned the Programme's establishment. This combination may explain why there was widespread support for its introduction and why implementation of the NCSP was inconsistent. The potential to improve young people's sexual health more comprehensively should be made explicit in future planning of the NCSP.

摘要

背景

英国国家衣原体筛查计划(NCSP)的基本原理受到了质疑。然而,对于推动 NCSP 的建立及其实施方式的分析却很少。这种分析将有助于为 NCSP 的未来发展提供信息。本研究采用定性、理论驱动的方法来评估 NCSP 建立和实施的基本原理。

方法

对 14 名衣原体筛查专家进行了半结构式访谈。使用框架方法,对访谈数据和同行评议期刊(1996-2010 年出版)的政策文件和评论进行了分析。

结果

有两个主题推动了 NCSP 的建立和实施。第一个主题是衣原体控制,在文件和访谈中被多次提及。第二个主题是衣原体筛查有可能促进更广泛的性健康改善。特别是,筛查有望促进初级保健中的性健康服务,并鼓励年轻人讨论性健康问题。虽然这个主题在政策文件中只是间接提及,但被受访者认为是该计划早期实施的重要影响因素。然而,随着该计划的全面实施,对筛查数量的关注可能限制了 NCSP 改善更广泛性健康方面的能力。

结论

明确和隐含的驱动因素共同构成了该计划的基础。这种组合可能解释了为什么它的引入得到了广泛的支持,以及为什么 NCSP 的实施不一致。在未来规划 NCSP 时,应该明确改善年轻人性健康的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09a2/3458993/267e975b0065/1471-2458-12-317-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09a2/3458993/a92a04e94624/1471-2458-12-317-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09a2/3458993/267e975b0065/1471-2458-12-317-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09a2/3458993/a92a04e94624/1471-2458-12-317-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09a2/3458993/267e975b0065/1471-2458-12-317-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Chlamydia screening in England: a qualitative study of the narrative behind the policy.英国的衣原体筛查:政策背后的叙事定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Apr 30;12:317. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-317.
2
Will chlamydia screening reach young people in deprived areas in England? Baseline analysis of the English National Chlamydia Screening Programme delivery in 2008.英格兰贫困地区的年轻人能接受衣原体筛查吗?2008 年英格兰国家衣原体筛查规划实施的基线分析。
Sex Transm Dis. 2011 Aug;38(8):677-84. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31821597ca.
3
Internet testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in England, 2006 to 2010.英格兰 2006 年至 2010 年沙眼衣原体互联网检测。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Dec 19;12:1095. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1095.
4
Promoting chlamydia screening with posters and leaflets in general practice--a qualitative study.在全科医疗中使用海报和传单推广衣原体筛查——一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2009 Oct 12;9:383. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-383.
5
Chlamydia screening in general practice: views of professionals on the key elements of a successful programme.全科医疗中的衣原体筛查:专业人士对成功项目关键要素的看法。
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2005 Oct;31(4):302-6. doi: 10.1783/147118905774480806.
6
Assessing the impact: the National Chlamydia Screening Programme.评估影响:国家衣原体筛查计划。
Br J Nurs. 2009;18(4):246-51. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2009.18.4.39625.
7
Establishing the National Chlamydia Screening Programme in England: results from the first full year of screening.在英格兰建立全国衣原体筛查计划:首个完整筛查年度的结果
Sex Transm Infect. 2004 Oct;80(5):335-41. doi: 10.1136/sti.2004.012856.
8
Exploring why a complex intervention piloted in general practices did not result in an increase in chlamydia screening and diagnosis: a qualitative evaluation using the fidelity of implementation model.探究在全科医疗中试行的一项复杂干预措施为何未导致衣原体筛查和诊断率上升:一项基于实施保真度模型的定性评估。
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Mar 21;18(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0618-0.
9
Chlamydia and HIV testing, contraception advice, and free condoms offered in general practice: a qualitative interview study of young adults' perceptions of this initiative.全科医疗中提供的衣原体和艾滋病毒检测、避孕建议及免费避孕套:一项关于年轻人对该举措看法的定性访谈研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Jul;67(660):e490-e500. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X691325. Epub 2017 May 22.
10
Qualitative interviews with healthcare staff in four European countries to inform adaptation of an intervention to increase chlamydia testing.对四个欧洲国家的医护人员进行定性访谈,以指导一项旨在增加衣原体检测的干预措施的调整。
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 25;7(9):e017528. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017528.

引用本文的文献

1
Chlamydial and Gonococcal Genital Infections: A Narrative Review.衣原体和淋球菌性生殖器感染:一篇叙述性综述。
J Pers Med. 2023 Jul 21;13(7):1170. doi: 10.3390/jpm13071170.
2
as a Current Health Problem: Challenges and Opportunities.作为一个当前的健康问题:挑战与机遇
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jul 25;12(8):1795. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12081795.

本文引用的文献

1
How to develop a theory-driven evaluation design? Lessons learned from an adolescent sexual and reproductive health programme in West Africa.如何制定一个理论驱动的评估设计?来自西非青少年性与生殖健康项目的经验教训。
BMC Public Health. 2010 Nov 30;10:741. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-741.
2
Getting research into policy, or out of practice, in HIV?
Lancet. 2010 Apr 24;375(9724):1414-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60585-5.
3
Screening and treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.
BMJ. 2010 Apr 21;340:c1915. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1915.
4
Screening for Chlamydia.衣原体筛查
BMJ. 2010 Apr 8;340:c1698. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1698.
5
Randomised controlled trial of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease: the POPI (prevention of pelvic infection) trial.随机对照试验筛查沙眼衣原体以预防盆腔炎:POPI(预防盆腔感染)试验。
BMJ. 2010 Apr 8;340:c1642. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1642.
6
Cabbages and condoms.卷心菜和避孕套。
Int J Epidemiol. 2009 Apr;38(2):327-9. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp177.
7
Effectiveness of chlamydia screening: systematic review.衣原体筛查的有效性:系统评价
Int J Epidemiol. 2009 Apr;38(2):435-48. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyn222. Epub 2008 Dec 5.
8
Debates about cervical screening: an historical overview.关于宫颈癌筛查的争论:历史概述
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008 Apr;62(4):284-7. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.059246.
9
Chlamydia screening--Australia should strive to achieve what others have not.衣原体筛查——澳大利亚应努力实现他人尚未达成的目标。
Med J Aust. 2008 Jan 21;188(2):106-8. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb01533.x.
10
Increase in Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Sweden: time for new strategies.瑞典沙眼衣原体感染率上升:是时候采取新策略了。
Arch Sex Behav. 2008 Jun;37(3):362-4. doi: 10.1007/s10508-007-9283-z.