• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Hospital guidelines for deciding about life-sustaining treatment: dealing with health "limbo".

作者信息

Meisel A, Grenvik A, Pinkus R L, Snyder J V

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1986 Mar;14(3):239-46. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198603000-00016.

DOI:10.1097/00003246-198603000-00016
PMID:3943341
Abstract

The decision to withhold life-sustaining treatment from hopelessly ill patients is fraught with ethical dilemmas and legal uncertainties. Although there are extensive published commentaries on the subject and the law is gradually becoming clearer, care-givers often need concrete guidance when confronted with actual cases. Hospital ethics committees can assist care-givers, patients, and families in resolving these dilemmas, but the committees also need some specific guidance to be relatively consistent. Therefore, the Ethics and Human Rights Committee of Presbyterian-University Hospital, one of the University Health Center Hospitals in Pittsburgh, has developed guidelines for deciding about life-sustaining treatment.

摘要

相似文献

1
Hospital guidelines for deciding about life-sustaining treatment: dealing with health "limbo".
Crit Care Med. 1986 Mar;14(3):239-46. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198603000-00016.
2
In our best interests: experience and working of an ethics review committee.符合我们的最大利益:伦理审查委员会的经验与运作
J Pediatr. 1986 Feb;108(2):178-88. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(86)80979-9.
3
Development of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center policy for the care of terminally ill patients who may become organ donors after death following the removal of life support.
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1993 Jun;3(2):131-43. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0175.
4
Termination of life support: guidelines for the development of institutional policy. Bay Area Network of Ethics Committees.终止生命维持治疗:机构政策制定指南。旧金山湾区伦理委员会网络
HEC Forum. 1990;2(3):171-201. doi: 10.1007/BF00057952.
5
Ethics committee develops supportive care guidelines.伦理委员会制定支持性护理指南。
Health Prog. 1985 Dec;66(10):26-30, 60.
6
Interdisciplinary consultation on the care of the critically ill and dying: the role of one hospital ethics committee.
Crit Care Med. 1982 Nov;10(11):776-84. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198211000-00018.
7
Decisions to forego life-sustaining treatment.
Va Med. 1989 Nov;116(11):462-5.
8
Limiting the role of the family in discontinuation of life sustaining treatment.限制家庭在终止维持生命治疗中的作用。
J Med Humanit. 1990 Summer;11(2):91-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01650689.
9
Playing God in the NICU. Ethical guidelines focus on what seems best for the handicapped infant--Saint Vincent Health Center, Erie, PA.
Health Prog. 1989 Mar;70(2):26-31.
10
"An ignoble form of cannibalism": reflections on the Pittsburgh protocol for procuring organs from non-heart-beating cadavers.
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1993 Jun;3(2):231-9. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0070.

引用本文的文献

1
Life-sustaining treatment decisions in Portuguese intensive care units: a national survey of intensive care physicians.葡萄牙重症监护病房的维持生命治疗决策:对重症监护医生的全国性调查。
Crit Care. 2003 Dec;7(6):R167-75. doi: 10.1186/cc2384. Epub 2003 Oct 6.
2
Decisions near the end of life: professional views on life-sustaining treatments.临终决策:关于维持生命治疗的专业观点
Am J Public Health. 1993 Jan;83(1):14-23. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.1.14.
3
Contributions of empirical research to medical ethics.实证研究对医学伦理学的贡献。
Theor Med. 1993 Sep;14(3):197-210. doi: 10.1007/BF00995162.