Campbell C S
Oregon State University.
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1992 Sep;2(3):253-77. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0163.
This article sets out a descriptive typology of religious perspectives on legalized euthanasia--political advocacy, individual conscience, silence, embedded opposition, and formal public opposition--and then examines the normative basis for these perspectives through the themes of sovereignty, stewardship, and the self. It also explores the public relevance of these religious perspectives for debates over legalized euthanasia, particularly in the realm of public policy. Ironically, the moral discourse of religious traditions on euthanasia may gain public relevance at the expense of its religious content. Nonetheless, religious traditions can provide a context of ultimacy and meaning to this debate, which is a condition for genuine pluralism. A table setting out the views of various denominations with regard to euthanasia is included.
本文阐述了关于安乐死合法化的宗教观点的描述性类型学——政治倡导、个人良知、沉默、内在反对和正式公开反对——然后通过主权、管理和自我等主题审视这些观点的规范基础。它还探讨了这些宗教观点在关于安乐死合法化的辩论中的公共相关性,特别是在公共政策领域。具有讽刺意味的是,宗教传统关于安乐死的道德话语可能以牺牲其宗教内容为代价而获得公共相关性。尽管如此,宗教传统可以为这场辩论提供一个终极性和意义的背景,这是真正多元主义的一个条件。文中还包含了一个列出各教派关于安乐死观点的表格。