Robbins R A
Department of Anesthesia, Pennsylvania State College of Medicine.
Death Stud. 1992 Nov-Dec;16(6):557-69. doi: 10.1080/07481189208252598.
Three groups of hospice volunteers, trainees (N = 52), medium-term (2 to 42 months, N = 94), long-term (48 months or more, N = 96), and nonhospice and nonpatient care controls (N = 78) completed Bugen's Coping with Death Scale, the Templer/McMordie Death Anxiety Scale, and a new self-efficacy scale related to hospice and the ability to deal with death in general. The groups did not differ on the Death Anxiety Scale. However, on the Coping with Death Scale, experienced volunteers scored higher than trainees and controls; and on the self-efficacy scale all hospice volunteer groups believed themselves more able to deal with death than controls. In this study, the death competency scales appear more useful than the death anxiety measure in distinguishing hospice patient care volunteers from controls. The potential usefulness of these scales in future efforts at selection and evaluation are noted.
三组临终关怀志愿者,即受训者(N = 52)、中期志愿者(2至42个月,N = 94)、长期志愿者(48个月及以上,N = 96),以及非临终关怀和非患者护理对照组(N = 78),完成了布根的应对死亡量表、坦普勒/麦克莫迪死亡焦虑量表,以及一个与临终关怀和总体应对死亡能力相关的新的自我效能量表。在死亡焦虑量表上,这些组之间没有差异。然而,在应对死亡量表上,经验丰富的志愿者得分高于受训者和对照组;在自我效能量表上,所有临终关怀志愿者组都认为自己比对照组更有能力应对死亡。在本研究中,死亡能力量表在区分临终关怀患者护理志愿者和对照组方面似乎比死亡焦虑测量更有用。文中指出了这些量表在未来选拔和评估工作中的潜在用途。