• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在神经感觉中心综合检查中对豪斯失语模型与魏森伯格和麦克布赖德失语模型的多变量比较。

Multivariate comparison of Howes' and Weisenburg and McBride's models of aphasia on the neurosensory center comprehensive examination.

作者信息

Crockett D J

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 1976 Dec;43(3 pt. 1):795-806. doi: 10.2466/pms.1976.43.3.795.

DOI:10.2466/pms.1976.43.3.795
PMID:1012865
Abstract

The verbal production of 57 aphasic patients was rated and used to assign these patients into two sets of groups reflecting Howes' and Weisenburg and McBride's models of aphasia. Test scores covering a broad range of communication skills and modalities were compared between these groups to examine the assumption that salient features of verbal production could be used to establish groups which would show significant differences on other important linguistic variables. Neither Howes' nor Weisenburg and McBride's model provided groups showing significant multivariate differences. It was suggested that these models be improved by expanding them to include other important psycholinguistic components of language skills. Since these models did not account for significant between group differences, caution was suggested in using these models for assessment or treatment purposes.

摘要

对57名失语症患者的言语表达进行评分,并据此将这些患者分为两组,以反映豪斯以及魏森伯格和麦克布赖德的失语症模型。对这两组患者在涵盖广泛沟通技能和方式的测试分数进行比较,以检验以下假设:言语表达的显著特征可用于划分出在其他重要语言变量上存在显著差异的组。豪斯模型以及魏森伯格和麦克布赖德模型均未得出存在显著多变量差异的分组。研究建议通过扩展这些模型,纳入语言技能的其他重要心理语言学组成部分来对其进行改进。由于这些模型未能解释组间的显著差异,因此建议在将这些模型用于评估或治疗目的时要谨慎。

相似文献

1
Multivariate comparison of Howes' and Weisenburg and McBride's models of aphasia on the neurosensory center comprehensive examination.在神经感觉中心综合检查中对豪斯失语模型与魏森伯格和麦克布赖德失语模型的多变量比较。
Percept Mot Skills. 1976 Dec;43(3 pt. 1):795-806. doi: 10.2466/pms.1976.43.3.795.
2
A comparison of empirically derived groups of aphasic patients on the Neurosensory Center Comprehensive Examination for Aphasia.对失语症患者根据经验得出的分组在神经感觉中心失语症综合检查中的比较。
J Clin Psychol. 1977 Jan;33(1):194-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197701)33:1+<194::aid-jclp2270330143>3.0.co;2-t.
3
A comparison of two groups of mentally retarded children on The Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities.
Train Sch Bull (Vinel). 1970 May;67(1):4-14.
4
[Verbal comprehension in aphasic and in normal subjects with a shortened version of the token test (author's transl)].[使用简版代币测验对失语症患者和正常受试者进行言语理解能力测试(作者译)]
Riv Patol Nerv Ment. 1975 Jul-Aug;96(4):252-69.
5
Language deviations in aphasia: a frequency analysis.失语症中的语言偏差:频率分析
Brain Lang. 1993 Feb;44(2):165-80. doi: 10.1006/brln.1993.1011.
6
Written discourse and acquired brain impairment: evaluation of structural and semantic features of personal letters from a Systemic Functional Linguistic perspective.书面语篇与后天性脑损伤:从系统功能语言学视角评估私人信件的结构和语义特征
Clin Linguist Phon. 2005 Apr-May;19(3):227-47. doi: 10.1080/02699200410001698652.
7
[Surgical management of hallux valgus by techniques preserving the first metatarsophalangeal joint: long-term results].[采用保留第一跖趾关节技术的拇外翻手术治疗:长期结果]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2007 Apr;74(2):105-10.
8
The natural history of aphasia.失语症的自然病史。
Adv Neurol. 1984;42:13-22.
9
Operative and nonoperative linguistic outcomes in brain injury patients.脑损伤患者的手术和非手术语言结果。
J Neurol Sci. 2012 Jun 15;317(1-2):130-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2012.02.009. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
10
A cross-validation study on the Token Test.
Neuropsychologia. 1973 Jan;11(1):119-21. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(73)90072-9.