Getzen T E
Center for Health Finance, School of Management, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 1992;13:83-128.
The historical development of price indexes as wage adjustment mechanisms is reviewed, as is the theory of aggregation and methods for dealing with quality and technological change. The construction of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Medical Care Price Index (MCPI) is detailed. ARIMA analysis of the MCPI for the period 1927-1990 indicates that; (i) the MCPI is largely a damped and delayed function of the CPI, with an average lag of 8 months; (ii) medical care prices rose 2-4 percent faster than the all-items CPI since 1950, but not for 1927-1950; (iii) health expenditures are affected primarily by the general CPI, with little independent effect of specifically medical prices. The MCPI is a reliable measure of changes in consumer prices with strong construct validity. However, it was not designed for use as a deflator of medical expenditures, and is misleading when erroneously employed in that unintended role. The price/quantity duality and linear expenditure function which form the basis of Laspeyres price indexes are not applicable to nonconcatenable goods such as insurance or medical care. In these complex transactions, quality dominates quantity, fixed prices are replaced by reimbursement and professional judgement, and the assumption of additive separability required to use the price index as a deflator of health expenditures is not valid.
本文回顾了价格指数作为工资调整机制的历史发展,以及汇总理论和应对质量与技术变革的方法。文中详细介绍了美国劳工统计局(BLS)医疗保健价格指数(MCPI)的编制情况。对1927年至1990年期间MCPI的自回归积分滑动平均(ARIMA)分析表明:(i)MCPI在很大程度上是消费价格指数(CPI)的一个衰减且延迟的函数,平均滞后8个月;(ii)自1950年以来,医疗保健价格的涨幅比所有项目的CPI快2%-4%,但1927年至1950年期间并非如此;(iii)医疗支出主要受一般CPI的影响,特定医疗价格的独立影响很小。MCPI是衡量消费者价格变化的可靠指标,具有很强的结构效度。然而,它并非设计用于作为医疗支出的平减指数,在错误地用于这一非预期用途时会产生误导。构成拉氏价格指数基础的价格/数量二元性和线性支出函数不适用于保险或医疗保健等不可串联的商品。在这些复杂交易中,质量主导数量,固定价格被报销和专业判断所取代,将价格指数用作医疗支出平减指数所需的可加分离性假设是无效的。